Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221275
Title: Spanish Multicenter Megaprosthesis Study (MEGAPROT) on 816 Tumor Prostheses: Main Results
Author: Pérez Muñoz, Israel
González Lizán, Fausto
Sanz Pascual, María del Carmen
Machado, Pau
Peiró, Ana
Angulo Sánchez, Manuel
Calva, Carolina de la
González Rojo, Paula
Asua Mentxaka, Libe
Arteagoitia, Iraia
Hernández González, Nerea
Merino Pérez, Josu
Zarzuela, Víctor Manuel
Puertas García-Sandoval, Pablo
Valero Cifuentes, Gregorio
Valcárcel, Antonio
Godoy Montijano, Amparo
Fernández Serrano, Francisco
González Acha, Javier
Esnaloa, Pello
Chaves, Iván
Coll Mesa, Luis
Baz Figueroa, Caleb
Álvarez Garma, Álvaro
Orce, Aida
Cebrián, Juan Luis
García Maroto, Roberto
Pablos González, Óscar
Maireles Pérez, Míriam
Fontalva Guerrero, María Luisa
Garcés Zarzalejo, Carlos
Estellés Marcos de León, Luis Roberto
Gracia Alegría, Isidro
Keywords: Pròtesis
Tumors
Prosthesis
Tumors
Issue Date: 28-Dec-2024
Publisher: MDPI
Abstract: (1) Background: The use of tumor megaprostheses faces challenges, but the published series are typically small and offer limited solutions. Our aim was to compile a large series; describe patient profiles and surgical techniques; analyze prosthetic survival identifying factors affecting survival; and provide a basis for future subanalyses. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective observational multicenter study that included patients with a tumor megaprosthesis in any anatomical location. Demographic, etiologic, and surgical variables were analyzed. Data on complications and survival were also collected. (3) Results: Our series includes a total of 816 prostheses (585 primary, 181 revision, and 50 second revision). The patients' mean age was 44.2 +/- 20.8 years. Primary surgeries were performed on the femur (n = 404; 69.1%), tibia (n = 79; 13.5%), humerus (n = 74; 12.6%), pelvis (n = 20; 3.4%), and scapula (n = 4; 0.7%). Survival following primary surgery was 73.3% at 10 years. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to survival from primary surgery between males and females (p = 0.194), between the different etiologies (p = 0.540), or between the lower and the upper limb (p = 0.618). In contrast, statistically significant survival differences were found when the type of fixation was analyzed (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: This study analyzed one of the largest series of patients treated with tumor megaprostheses, demonstrating their acceptable survival and validating them as a treatment option for bone tumors.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7010002
It is part of: Prosthesis, 2024, vol. 7, num. 1
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221275
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7010002
ISSN: 2673-1592
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
prosthesis-07-00002.pdf734.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons