Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221275
Title: | Spanish Multicenter Megaprosthesis Study (MEGAPROT) on 816 Tumor Prostheses: Main Results |
Author: | Pérez Muñoz, Israel González Lizán, Fausto Sanz Pascual, María del Carmen Machado, Pau Peiró, Ana Angulo Sánchez, Manuel Calva, Carolina de la González Rojo, Paula Asua Mentxaka, Libe Arteagoitia, Iraia Hernández González, Nerea Merino Pérez, Josu Zarzuela, Víctor Manuel Puertas García-Sandoval, Pablo Valero Cifuentes, Gregorio Valcárcel, Antonio Godoy Montijano, Amparo Fernández Serrano, Francisco González Acha, Javier Esnaloa, Pello Chaves, Iván Coll Mesa, Luis Baz Figueroa, Caleb Álvarez Garma, Álvaro Orce, Aida Cebrián, Juan Luis García Maroto, Roberto Pablos González, Óscar Maireles Pérez, Míriam Fontalva Guerrero, María Luisa Garcés Zarzalejo, Carlos Estellés Marcos de León, Luis Roberto Gracia Alegría, Isidro |
Keywords: | Pròtesis Tumors Prosthesis Tumors |
Issue Date: | 28-Dec-2024 |
Publisher: | MDPI |
Abstract: | (1) Background: The use of tumor megaprostheses faces challenges, but the published series are typically small and offer limited solutions. Our aim was to compile a large series; describe patient profiles and surgical techniques; analyze prosthetic survival identifying factors affecting survival; and provide a basis for future subanalyses. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective observational multicenter study that included patients with a tumor megaprosthesis in any anatomical location. Demographic, etiologic, and surgical variables were analyzed. Data on complications and survival were also collected. (3) Results: Our series includes a total of 816 prostheses (585 primary, 181 revision, and 50 second revision). The patients' mean age was 44.2 +/- 20.8 years. Primary surgeries were performed on the femur (n = 404; 69.1%), tibia (n = 79; 13.5%), humerus (n = 74; 12.6%), pelvis (n = 20; 3.4%), and scapula (n = 4; 0.7%). Survival following primary surgery was 73.3% at 10 years. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to survival from primary surgery between males and females (p = 0.194), between the different etiologies (p = 0.540), or between the lower and the upper limb (p = 0.618). In contrast, statistically significant survival differences were found when the type of fixation was analyzed (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: This study analyzed one of the largest series of patients treated with tumor megaprostheses, demonstrating their acceptable survival and validating them as a treatment option for bone tumors. |
Note: | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7010002 |
It is part of: | Prosthesis, 2024, vol. 7, num. 1 |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221275 |
Related resource: | https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7010002 |
ISSN: | 2673-1592 |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL)) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
prosthesis-07-00002.pdf | 734.88 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a
Creative Commons License