Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221424
Title: Does pregabalin offer potential as a first-line therapy for generalized anxiety disorder? A meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness
Author: Cardoner, N. (Narcís)
Gutiérrez-Rojas, Luis
Sáiz Martínez, Pilar Alejandra
Lahera, Guillermo
Álvarez-Mon, Miguel Ángel
Alonso Ortega, María del Pino
Pérez-Paramo, Maria
Keywords: Anticonvulsius
Metaanàlisi
Ansietat
Benzodiazepines
Anticonvulsants
Meta-analysis
Anxiety
Benzodiazepines
Issue Date: 7-Feb-2025
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Abstract: Introduction: Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) is a mental health condition with a recent increase in prevalence. GAD is often underdiagnosed, leading to negative consequences for individuals, healthcare systems, and society. The economic burden and impaired quality of life associated with GAD underscores the need for effective treatment. Pregabalin has shown promise in reducing anxiety symptoms; however, further research is needed to evaluate its efficacy and compare it with other treatment options. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and optimal pregabalin dosage for the treatment of GAD. Methods: This meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Pregabalin-treated patients comprised the intervention group, whereas the comparator group received benzodiazepines, SSRIs, SNRIs, or placebo. Efficacy and safety were evaluated using various scales and adverse events (AEs). Randomized clinical trials were included in the study. Four major databases were used for this study. Outcome measures included the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I), discontinuation rates, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software, employing odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed based on follow-up and dosage. Results: Fourteen studies involving 4,822 patients were analyzed. Pregabalin demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing HAM-A global scores at 2 weeks (MD -1.23, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.66), 4 weeks (MD -1.12, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.63), 8 weeks (MD -2.50, 95% CI -4.21 to -0.79), 12 weeks (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.35-1.63), and 6 months to 1 year (MD -3.31, 95% CI -4.30 to -2.31). Pregabalin also showed a higher response rate to HAM-A (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31 1.75). CGI-I scores favored pregabalin (MD -0.25, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.12), with a higher response rate (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.55). The discontinuation rates were lower with pregabalin (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70, 0.91). Adverse events favored pregabalin over SSRIs/SNRIs and benzodiazepines at different doses. Pregabalin was associated with higher cost-effectiveness (MD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01, 0.03). Conclusion: Pregabalin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, showing superior efficacy and safety compared with first-line medications.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1483770
It is part of: Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025, vol. 16
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221424
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1483770
ISSN: 1663-9812
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
894558.pdf3.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons