Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221445
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGonzalo, Josep-
dc.contributor.authorCastelo-Branco Flores, Camil-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorDevesa, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorPolyzos, Nikolaos P.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-10T08:48:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-10T08:48:55Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-27-
dc.identifier.issn2710-2580-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/221445-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of two ovarian stimulation procedures comparing the use of FSH antagonists with the use of FSH progestin primed controlled ovarian stimulation in an oocyte donor program. Design: To calculate cost-effectiveness ratios (costs per outcome achieved) from clinical practices using a retrospective cohort single university center study carried out from 2012 to 2021. Main outcome measure(s): Cost-effectiveness ratios as cost per mature oocyte and cost per treatment. Results: According to the economic analysis, ovarian stimulation with FSH antagonist protocol increased statistically significantly the overall cost of the treatment as well as the cost per retrieved and effective oocyte. The cost of gonadotrophins per mature oocyte retrieved was 49.27 ± 17.94 € and the cost of medication per mature retrieved oocyte was 59.26 ± 28.01 €. In the FSH primed progesterone group, the cost of gonadotrophins per mature retrieved oocyte was 44.67 ± 16.65 € and the cost of medication per mature retrieved oocyte retrieved 44.91 ± 20.86 €. Conclusion: Cost-effectiveness is a compelling reason for an egg donation program. Progestins can present an effective and less expensive option for egg donation programs in terms of cost.-
dc.format.extent7 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherESG-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.53260/EGO.246033-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Gynecology and Obstetrics EGO, 2024, vol. 6, num.3, p. 101-107-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.53260/EGO.246033-
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Gonzalo J. et al., 2024-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)-
dc.subject.classificationAnàlisi cost-benefici-
dc.subject.classificationDonacions-
dc.subject.classificationProgesterona-
dc.subject.otherCost effectiveness-
dc.subject.otherGifts-
dc.subject.otherProgesterone-
dc.titleEconomic impact of ovarian stimulation antagonist protocol vs primed progesterone protocol in oocyte donor program: A retrospective study,-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec758513-
dc.date.updated2025-06-10T08:48:55Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
893830.pdf737.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons