Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221636
Title: M-TRAP: Safety and performance of metastatic tumor cell trap device in advanced ovarian cancer patients
Author: Gil Moreno, Antonio
Alonso Alconada, Lorena
Díaz Feijoo, Berta
Domingo, Santiago
Vilar, Ana
Hernández, Alicia
Torné Bladé, Aureli
Gilabert Estellés, Juan
Llueca, Antoni
de Santiago, Javier
Carbonell Socias, Melchor
Lago, Víctor
Arias, Efigenia
Sampayo, Victoria
Chipirliu, Anca
Siegrist, Jaime
Santacana, Maria
Matias-Guiu, Xavier, 1958-
Abal Posada, Miguel
Padilla Iserte, Pablo
Sánchez Iglesias, Jose Luis
Pérez Benavente, Asunción
López López, Rafael
Keywords: Cirurgia
Quimioteràpia
Metàstasi
Assaigs clínics
Càncer d'ovari
Surgery
Chemotherapy
Metastasis
Clinical trials
Ovarian cancer
Issue Date: 29-Mar-2021
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract: Objective: Despite radical surgery and chemotherapy, most patients with ovarian cancer die due to disease progression. M-Trap is an implantable medical device designed to capture peritoneal disseminated tumor cells with the aim to focalize the disease. This trial analyzed the safety and performance of the device. Methods: This first-in-human prospective, multi-center, non-blinded, single-arm study enrolled 23 women with high-grade serous advanced ovarian cancer. After primary or interval debulking surgery, 3 M-Trap devices were placed in the peritoneum of the abdominal cavity. 18-months post-implantation or at disease progression, devices were initially removed by laparoscopy. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from device and procedure-related major adverse events (MAEs) through 6-months post-implantation compared to an historical control. The primary performance endpoint was histopathologic evidence of tumor cells capture. Results: Only one major adverse event was attributable to the device. 18 women were free of device and procedure related MAEs (78.3%). However, the primary safety endpoint was not achieved (p = 0.131), primarily attributable to the greater surgical complexity of the M-Trap patient population. 62% of recurrent patients demonstrated tumor cell capture in at least one device with a minimal tumor cell infiltration. No other long-term device-related adverse events were reported. The secondary performance endpoint demonstrated a lack of disease focalization. Conclusions: The M-Trap technology failed to meet its primary safety objective, although when adjusted for surgical complexity, the study approved it. Likewise, the devices did not demonstrate the anticipated benefits in terms of tumor cell capture and disease focalization in recurrent ovarian cancer.
Note: Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.022
It is part of: Gynecologic Oncology, 2021, vol. 161, num.3, p. 681-686
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221636
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.022
ISSN: 0090-8258
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
894945.pdf5.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons