Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/222103
Title: | A Multicenter Study by the DENO Research Group on the Use of Denosumab in Giant-Cell Tumors of the Bone |
Author: | Research Group, Deno De La Calva, Carolina Angulo, Manuel González-rojo, Paula Peiró, Ana Machado, Pau Luis Cebrián, Juan García-maroto, Roberto Valcárcel, Antonio Puertas, Pablo Valero-cifuentes, Gregorio Pablos, Óscar Maireles, Miriam Luisa Fontalva, María Chaves, Iván Orce, Aida Coll-mesa, Luis Pérez, Israel González, Fausto Del Carmen Sanz, María Gracia, Isidro |
Issue Date: | 7-May-2025 |
Publisher: | MDPI AG |
Abstract: | Background/Objectives: Despite the therapeutic potential of denosumab for the treatment of giant-cell tumors of the bone (GCTBs), there is a lack of standardization in treatment protocols. Methods: We present a multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study conducted across the seven hospitals in Spain affiliated with the DENO Research Group. Seventy-three patients diagnosed with GCTB and treated with denosumab were included and stratified according to treatment strategy-neoadjuvant (n = 38), adjuvant (n = 8), and single treatment (n = 27). Results: Patients in the neoadjuvant group received denosumab for a median of 6.1 months, with reintroduction after surgery in 25.8% of all cases. Among the neoadjuvant patients treated with curettage, recurrence was 35.5%, with no association with denosumab treatment duration (p = 0.274) nor with denosumab reintroduction after surgery (p = 0.405). In the adjuvant group, those who completed treatment received denosumab for 15.3 months, while those still undergoing therapy received it for a median of 12.8 months; only one case (12.5%) recurred. Recurrence rates in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies were not different (p = 0.394). Patients treated only with denosumab and no longer on treatment had received it for 34.2 months, with 31.3% recurrence; those still on treatment had received it for 51.8 months, with 25.0% recurrence. Across all strategies, more than 85% of patients reported favorable clinical outcomes, and only 43.8% presented adverse events. No deaths occurred during this study. Conclusions: Although patients who experienced recurrence during neoadjuvant treatment had longer durations of denosumab administration, the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, recurrence rates did not differ significantly, whether denosumab was reintroduced after surgery or not. Among the patients treated with curettage, recurrence rates were comparable between neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies. Discontinuation of the single treatment did not necessarily result in disease progression. |
Note: | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093242 |
It is part of: | Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025, vol. 14, issue. 9, p. 3242 |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/222103 |
Related resource: | https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093242 |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL)) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
jcm-14-03242.pdf | 442.91 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a
Creative Commons License