Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/223981
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Moreno, José-
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Martínez, Ester-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Arán, Anabel, 1971--
dc.contributor.authorVieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963--
dc.contributor.authorMontejo Egido, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorSommerhof, Constanza-
dc.contributor.authorBort, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorD’Alessandro, Giulia-
dc.contributor.authorFico, Giovanna-
dc.contributor.authorDe Prisco, Michele-
dc.contributor.authorOliva, Vincenzo-
dc.contributor.authorSolé Cabezuelo, Brisa-
dc.contributor.authorTorrent Font, Carla-
dc.contributor.authorMurru, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Rey, Arturo-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-30T14:45:40Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-30T14:45:40Z-
dc.identifier.issn2194-7511-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/223981-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Predominant polarity (PP) has emerged as a valuable course specifier in bipolar disorder (BD) with implications for prognosis and treatment planning. As the BD population ages, understanding its clinical characteristics becomes essential to tailor personalized interventions across the lifespan. This study aimed to characterize the distribution and clinical profiles of PP subgroups in a cohort of older adults with BD (OABD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 101 euthymic OABD aged >50 years. Clinical, neuropsychological and functional characteristics were compared between depressive (DPP), manic (MPP), and undetermined predominant polarity (UPP) subgroups, based on at least 2/3 of lifetime episodes being either depressive or manic polarity. Results: UPP was the most frequent PP in OABD (59.4%), followed by DPP (27.7%) and MPP (12.9%). Patients with DPP presented a later age of onset, a depressive first episode, less psychiatric hospitalizations, and a trend to outperform MPP and UPP in visual memory. Participants with MPP presented more frequently with manic onset. The UPP subgroup exhibited worse clinical outcomes, including higher number of total episodes, more frequent suicidal ideation and seasonality, and worse financial disability compared to DPP. Conclusion: PP classification distinguishes meaningful clinical and cognitive subgroups in OABD. The UPP subgroup associates with greater illness severity and functional impairment. These findings support the integration of PP into personalized treatment and prevention strategies in aging BD. Future longitudinal studies are needed to further clarify the trajectory of PP across the lifespan.-
dc.format.extent11 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Open-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-025-00392-9-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 2025, vol. 13-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-025-00392-9-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Sommerhoff, C. et al., 2025-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.classificationTrastorn bipolar-
dc.subject.classificationPersones grans-
dc.subject.otherManic-depressive illness-
dc.subject.otherOlder people-
dc.titleThe role of predominant polarity in older age bipolar disorder-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec761306-
dc.date.updated2025-10-30T14:45:40Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
902768.pdf1.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons