Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/55627
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Martínez, Lidia-
dc.contributor.authorEscribano Patón, César-
dc.contributor.authorVeiga Crespo, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorVilla, Tomás G.-
dc.contributor.authorVinuesa Aumedes, Teresa-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-09T10:37:58Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-09T10:37:58Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.issn0250-4693-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/55627-
dc.description.abstractRegular use of mouth rinses modifies the oral habitat, since bacterial populations are submitted to a high selective pressure during the treatment exercised by the active presence of the disinfectant. Mostly mouth rinses are based on the antibacterial effect of Chlorhexidine, Triclosan, essential oils and other antibacterials although other pharmaceutical characteristics can also affect their effectiveness. In this paper we compare"in vitro" the antibacterial effect of different oral rinsing solutions. Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) and Minimal Bactericidal Concentrations (MBC) were determined as well as the kinetics of bacterial death in the presence of letal concentrations of the mouth rinses. MIC values expressed as Maximal Inhibitory Dilution (MID) of the mouth rinse ranged from 1 to 1/2048 depending on the microorganism and product, whereas Minimal Biocidal Concentration (MBC), expressed as Maximal Biocidal Dilution (MBD) ranged from 1 to 1/1024, being in general one dilution less than MIC. Maximal Biocidal Dilution is a good tool to measure the actual efficiency of mouth washing solutions. However, kinetics of death seems to be better in our work killing curves demonstrate that bacterial populations are mostly eliminated during the first minute after the contact of bacterial suspension and the mouth-washing solution. In all tested bacterial species mouth-washing solutions tested were able to reduce until suspension treated except 1 and 5-
dc.format.extent7 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherGroupement International pour la Recherche Scientifique en Stomatologie et Odontologie-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/bullgirso/issue/archive-
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin du GIRSO, 2007, vol. 48, num. 1, p. 32-38-
dc.rights(c) Groupement International pour la Recherche Scientifique en Stomatologie et Odontologie, 2007-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental)-
dc.subject.classificationHigiene dental-
dc.subject.classificationHigiene bucal-
dc.subject.classificationDentifricis-
dc.subject.classificationDesinfectants-
dc.subject.classificationAgents antiinfecciosos-
dc.subject.otherDental hygiene-
dc.subject.otherOral hygiene-
dc.subject.otherDentifrices-
dc.subject.otherDisinfectants-
dc.subject.otherAnti-infective agents-
dc.title"In vitro" comparative experimental study of antimicrobial action of mouth washing products-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec566440-
dc.date.updated2014-07-09T10:37:58Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
566440.pdf84.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.