# name
Assessing risk and protective factors in clinical and judicial child-to-parent violence cases

# metadata.dc.description.abstract[].value
Child-to-parent violence takes different forms (physical, psychological or economic) and can be addressed in the judicial system or in clinical practice. The current paper compares 61 clinical and 30 judicialized cases that were evaluated using the Child-to-Parent Violence Risk assessment tool (CPVR). Results showed a higher prevalence of risk factors in the judicialsample. This group of aggressors had worse profiles of violence (bidirectionality of the parent/child violence, violenceother than CPV, and more CPV complaints), more psychological issues (low frustration tolerance, little anger management, narcissism, and violent attitudes) and, most notably, more dysfunctional families (violence between parents, cohabitationproblems, inversion of the hierarchy, non-violent conflicts, and even criminal history of the parents). Logistic regressionshowed that narcissism, attitudes justifying violence, violence between parents, and problems of parents themselves(such mental disorders or drug abuse) allowed for correct classification of 89.4% of cases. Total CPVR scores differedbetween groups (25.8 vs. 14.2), and classification was good for both type of group (AUC = .830) and injuries to mother (AUC= .764). A cut-off score between 22 and 23 showed the best results in prediction of group and injuries to mother. Utility ofthe CPVR, and next steps in its development are discussed.

# metadata.dc.relation.ispartof[].value
European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2020, vol. 12, num. 1, p. 43-51

# metadata.dc.rights[].value
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid, 2020

# metadata.dc.source[].value
Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)

# metadata.dc.title[].value
Assessing risk and protective factors in clinical and judicial child-to-parent violence cases