# name
Blood glucose monitoring in critically ill adult patients: type of sample and method of analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis

# metadata.dc.description.abstract[].value
Introduction: The clinical guideline for the management of sepsis, recommends using arterial blood samples for glycaemic control. A multicentre study in 86 Spanish intensive care units (ICU) revealed that 85.4% of ICUs used capillary puncture. Objective: To analyse the reliability of glycaemia by comparing different blood samples(arterial, venous, capillary) and instruments (glucometers, gasometers, central laboratory). Secondarily, to estimate the effect of confounding variables and the performance of measuring instruments as determined by different quality standards. Methodology: Systematic review and meta-analysis with search in PubMed, CINAHL and Embase data bases in September-2021 and September-2022, with no time or language limits. Grey literature sources: DART-Europe, OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Results summarised by qualitative (description of results, study characteristics) and quantitative (meta-analysis to assess standardised mean difference) synthesis. Methodological quality of articles assessed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Protocol: https://osf.io/ DOI10.17605/OSF.IO/T8KYP. Results: A total of 32 articles and 5451 patients were included. No discrepancies were obtained between arterial glucometer vs laboratory samples [bias (95%CI): 0.01 (−0.12 to 0.14) mg/dL].In contrast, arterial samples with a gasometer did significantly overestimate [bias (95%CI): 0.12(0.01 to 0.24) mg/dL]. The same trend is seen in capillaries with a glucometer, although not significantly [bias (95%CI): 0.07 (-−0.02 to 0.15) mg/dL]. There is discrepancy between studies on the effect of haematocrit and acid-base balance. The greatest consensus is on the poor agreement of glucometer with capillary vs laboratory samples in the presence of shock and vasopressor support, renal failure or during vitamin C treatment.Conclusions: The evidence to date recommends the use of arterial blood with a blood glucose meter for better reliability of glycaemic analysis and less effect of possible confound ingvariables, frequently present in the critically ill adult patient

# metadata.dc.rights[].value
cc-by (c) Arias-Rivera, Susana et al., 2023

# metadata.dc.source[].value
Articles publicats en revistes (Infermeria Fonamental i Clínica)

# metadata.dc.title[].value
Blood glucose monitoring in critically ill adult patients: type of sample and method of analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis