# name
Conflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation discussion group, April 2009

# metadata.dc.description.abstract[].value
A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that around 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once. Up to 33% admit other questionable practices such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, undisclosed changes in pre-research protocols or dubious ethical behavior. There can be no doubt that discovered cases of research and publication misconduct represent a tip of an iceberg and many cases go unreported.

# metadata.dc.relation.ispartof[].value
Croatian Medical Journal, 2010, vol. 51, num. 1, p. 7-15

# metadata.dc.rights[].value
cc-by-nd (c) Marcovitch, Harvey et al., 2010

# metadata.dc.source[].value
Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

# metadata.dc.title[].value
Conflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation discussion group, April 2009