# metadata.dc.description.abstract[].value
Englert et al. (Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 47a, 1175-1186, 1992) claim that, in certain circumstances, the Bohmian trajectory of a test particle does not match the reports of which-path detectors, concluding that the Bohmian trajectories are not real, but 'surrealistic.' However, Hiley and Callaghan (Physica Scripta, 74, 336-348, 2006) argue that, if Bohm's interpretation is correctly applied, no such mismatch is ever sanctioned. Unfortunately, the debate was never settled since nobody showed where the source of disagreement resided. In this paper, I reassess the debate over such 'surrealistic' trajectories and I derive both a necessary and a sufficient condition for there to be a mismatch between the Bohmian trajectories and the reports of which-path detectors. I conclude that the mismatch is possible as a matter of principle, but can be ruled out in practice. I explore in depth the philosophical consequences of such mismatch arguing that it does not render realism about the Bohmian trajectories untenable. In addition, I show that the opposing conclusion of Hiley and Callaghan is due to the fact that they assume a set of trajectories that are incompatible with the postulates of Bohmian mechanics.

# metadata.dc.relation.ispartof[].value
European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2017, vol. 7, p. 467-492

# metadata.dc.source[].value
Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)