# name
How and When Do Leaders Influence Employees' Well-Being? Moderated Mediation Models for Job Demands and Resources

# metadata.dc.description.abstract[].value
Following the call of recent reviews on leadership and well-being, the purpose of this study is to examine how and when two contrasting leadership styles, transformational leadership (TFL) and passive-avoidant leadership (PAL), are related to employees' anxiety and thereby either promote or inhibit employees' well-being. Using the prominent job demands-resources (JD-R) model as a theoretical framework, we propose that the relationship between leadership behavior and anxiety is mediated by organizational job demands, namely, role ambiguity (RA), and job resources, namely, team climate for learning (TCL), as well as moderated by autonomy as important job characteristic. A sample of 501 knowledge workers, working in teams in a German research and development (R&D) organization, answered an online survey. We tested moderated multiple mediation models using structural equation modeling (SEM). Results demonstrated that the relationships between TFL as well as PAL on the one hand and anxiety on the other hand were fully mediated by RA and TCL. Job autonomy moderated the quality of the leadership-job demand relationship for TFL and PAL. This paper contributes to understanding the complex relationship between leadership and followers' well-being taking into account a combination of mediating and moderating job demands and resources. This is the first study that examines the effects of TFL and PAL on well-being taking into account the job demand RA and team processes and autonomy as resources.

# metadata.dc.relation.ispartof[].value
Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, vol. 10, p. 2788

# metadata.dc.source[].value
Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)

# metadata.dc.title[].value
How and When Do Leaders Influence Employees' Well-Being? Moderated Mediation Models for Job Demands and Resources