# name
Treatment of oral mucocele - scalpel versus CO2 laser

# metadata.dc.description.abstract[].value
Objective: To compare the results obtained after oral mucocele resection with the scalpel versus the CO2 laser, based on the complications and recurrences after surgery Patients and Methods: Of the 68 patients we studied who have mucocele, 38 were resected with a scalpel and the remaining 30 with the CO2 laser (5-7 W). Patient sex and age were documented, along with location of the lesion as well as size, symptoms, duration, etiological factors, type of treatment, complications and recurrences after surgical removal. Results: The sample comprised 40 males and 28 females, aged between 6-65 years. The histological diagnosis was extravasation mucocele in 95% of the cases. The most frequent location was the lower lip (73.5%). The mean lesion diameter was 9 mm , and in most cases no evident etiological factor was recorded. The mean duration of the lesion was 4 months. Among the cases of conventional surgical removal of mucocele, recurrence was recorded in 8.8% of the cases, and 13.2% of the patients suffered postoperative complications - the most frequent being the presence of fibrous scars. There were no complications or relapses after a minimum follow-up of 12 months in the cases subjected to CO2 laser treatment. Conclusions: Oral mucocele ablation with the CO2 laser offers more predictable results and fewer complications and recurrences than conventional resection with the scalpel

# metadata.dc.relation.isformatof[].value
Podeu consultar la versió en castellà del document a: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/145949

# metadata.dc.relation.ispartof[].value
Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2009, vol. 14, num. 9, p. 469-474

# metadata.dc.title[].value
Treatment of oral mucocele - scalpel versus CO2 laser