Palmira, Michele2020-03-302020-03-3020131757-0522https://hdl.handle.net/2445/154368Thomas Kelly has argued that the Equal Weight View of peer disagreement is committed both to belief revision and to the Uniqueness Thesis, which claims that for any hypothesis H and a total body of evidence e, there is some one-doxastic attitude that is uniquely rational to adopt towards H. I rebut both theses and I also defend the view that in Kelly's case the Uniqueness Thesis doesn't require belief revision.2 p.application/pdfeng(c) Palmira, Michele, 2013Teoria del coneixementCreença i dubteTheory of knowledgeBelief and doubtinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article6863582020-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess