Was the Classical Tradition Betrayed by J. Ivory's adaptation of E. M. Forster's "Maurice"?

Gilabert Barberà, Pau2010-04-152010-04-152004https://hdl.handle.net/2445/12130Podeu consultar la versió en català a: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/12131 ; i en castellà a: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/12132Versió de l'article anteriorment publicat a: BELLS. Barcelona English language and literature studies, Núm. 13 (2004)According to Literature and Film studies and from the point of view of the influence of Classical Tradition on Western Culture -Classical Greek Tradition, in this case-, this article is an accurate analysis of the inevitable -to a certain degree- screenwriters betrayals regarding the literary texts that they adapt. However, in spite of being practically inevitable, Dr. Pau Gilabert Barberà indicates which are in his opinion the limits beyond which Ivory/Hesketh-Harvey should have not gone in order not to dilute the Hellenic temper of E. M. Forster's Maurice.15 p.131014 bytesapplication/pdfengcc-by-nc-nd, (c) Gilabert, 2004http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/Eros (Divinitat grega)Adaptacions cinematogràfiquesHesketh-Harvey, KitIvory James. MauriceForster, E. M. (Edward Morgan), 1879-1970. MauricePlatonismeLiteratura anglesaHomosexualitat en la literaturaEstudis lesbians i gaisTradició clàssicaCinematografiaEros (Greek deity)Film adaptationsHesketh-Harvey, KitIvory James. MauriceForster, E. M. (Edward Morgan), 1879-1970. MauricePlatonismEnglish literatureHomosexuality in literatureGay and lesbian studiesClassical traditionCinematographyWas the Classical Tradition Betrayed by J. Ivory's adaptation of E. M. Forster's "Maurice"?info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess