Fàbregas Salis, Pere2023-12-1920200392-6338https://hdl.handle.net/2445/204900This paper argues that Ov. met. 11, 17 was corrupted due to scribal rejection of lengthening in arsi and defends Gebhardus and Heinsius’s neglected conjecture tympanaque plaususque.12 p.eng(c) Fabrizio Serra Editore, 2020Manuscrits llatinsFilologia clàssicaCrítica textualLatin manuscriptsClassical philologyTextual criticismA Note on Ovid, Metamorphoses 11, 17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess