Rades, DirkLomidze, DarejanJankarashvili, NataliaLópez Campos, FernandoNavarro Martín, ArturoSegedin, BarbaraGroselj, BlazStaackmann, ChristianKristiansen, CharlotteDennis, KristopherSchild, Steven E.Cacicedo, Jon2024-07-012024-07-012024-03-142072-6694https://hdl.handle.net/2445/214024Simple Summary Patients with MESCC and favorable survival prognoses assigned to radiotherapy alone may benefit from increased doses. In a multi-center phase 2 trial, patients receiving 15 x 2.633 Gy or 18 x 2.333 Gy were evaluated and subsequently compared to a historical control group receiving 10 x 3.0 Gy. The phase 2 cohort, including 50 (of 62 planned) evaluable patients, showed promising results regarding 12-month local progression-free survival (LPFS), 12-month overall survival (OS), improvement of motor and sensory functions, post-radiotherapy ambulatory status, and relief of pain and distress. Radiotherapy with 15 x 2.633 Gy or 18 x 2.333 Gy was well tolerated and appeared more effective than 10 x 3.0 Gy with respect to LPFS and improvement of motor function.Abstract Patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and favorable survival prognoses may benefit from radiation doses exceeding 10 x 3.0 Gy. In a multi-center phase 2 trial, patients receiving 15 x 2.633 Gy (41.6 Gy10) or 18 x 2.333 Gy (43.2 Gy10) were evaluated for local progression-free survival (LPFS), motor/sensory functions, ambulatory status, pain, distress, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). They were compared (propensity score-adjusted Cox regression) to a historical control group (n = 266) receiving 10 x 3.0 Gy (32.5 Gy10). In the phase 2 cohort, 50 (of 62 planned) patients were evaluated for LPFS. Twelve-month rates of LPFS and OS were 96.8% and 69.9%, respectively. Motor and sensory functions improved in 56% and 57.1% of patients, and 94.0% were ambulatory following radiotherapy. Pain and distress decreased in 84.4% and 78.0% of patients. Ten and two patients experienced grade 2 and 3 toxicities, respectively. Phase 2 patients showed significantly better LPFS than the control group (p = 0.039) and a trend for improved motor function (p = 0.057). Ambulatory and OS rates were not significantly different. Radiotherapy with 15 x 2.633 Gy or 18 x 2.333 Gy was well tolerated and appeared superior to 10 x 3.0 Gy.12 p.application/pdfengcc by (c) Rades, Dirk et al, 2024http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/RadioteràpiaMedul·la espinalRadiotherapySpinal Cordinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2024-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess38539484