Ferrer Quintero, MartaFernández-Martínez, DanielLópez Carrilero, RaquelBirulés, IreneBarajas, AnaLorente Rovira, EstherLuengo, AnaDíaz-Cutraro, LucianaVerdaguer, MarinaGarcía Mieres, HelenaGutiérrez Zotes, José AlfonsoGrasa, EvaPousa, EstherHuerta-Ramos, ElenaPélaez, TriniBarrigón, María LuisaGómez Benito, JuanaGonzález-Higueras, FermínRuiz-Delgado, IsabelCid, JordiMoritz, SteffenSevilla-Llewellyn-Jones, JuliaOchoa Güerre, Susana2024-11-262024-11-262022-10-010940-1334https://hdl.handle.net/2445/216760Defcits in social cognition and metacognition impact the course of psychosis. Sex diferences in social cognition and metacognition could explain heterogeneity in psychosis. 174 (58 females) patients with frst-episode psychosis completed a clinical, neuropsychological, social cognitive, and metacognitive assessment. Subsequent latent profle analysis split by sex yielded two clusters common to both sexes (a Homogeneous group, 53% and 79.3%, and an Indecisive group, 18.3% and 8.6% of males and females, respectively), a specifc male profle characterized by presenting jumping to conclusions (28.7%) and a specifc female profle characterized by cognitive biases (12.1%). Males and females in the homogeneous profle seem to have a more benign course of illness. Males with jumping to conclusions had more clinical symptoms and more neuropsychological defcits. Females with cognitive biases were younger and had lower self-esteem. These results suggest that males and females may beneft from specifc targeted treatment and highlights the need to consider sex when planning interventions.13 p.application/pdfengcc by (c) Ferrer Quintero, Marta et al., 2022https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/CognicióMetacognicióDiferències entre sexesPsicosiEsquizofrèniaCognitionMetacognitionSex differencesPsychosesSchizophreniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article7515792024-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess