Marcovitch, HarveyBarbour, VirginiaBorrell i Thió, CarmeBosch, FèlixFernández Muñoz, EsteveMacdonald, HelenMarusic, AnaNylenna, Magne2020-04-222020-04-222010-02-010353-9504https://hdl.handle.net/2445/156778A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that around 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once. Up to 33% admit other questionable practices such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, undisclosed changes in pre-research protocols or dubious ethical behavior. There can be no doubt that discovered cases of research and publication misconduct represent a tip of an iceberg and many cases go unreported.9 p.application/pdfengcc-by-nd (c) Marcovitch, Harvey et al., 2010http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/esRecercaIndústria farmacèuticaDiscussióResearchPharmaceutical industryDiscussionConflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation discussion group, April 2009info:eu-repo/semantics/article6071192020-04-22info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess20162740