Juvé Udina, EulàliaGonzález Samartino, MaribelMatud Calvo, Cristina2013-04-182013-04-1820122090-5483https://hdl.handle.net/2445/34642Background: Nursing terminologies are designed to support nursing practice but, as with any other clinical tool, they should be evaluated. Cross-mapping is a formal method for examining the validity of the existing controlled vocabularies. Objectives: The study aims to assess the inclusiveness and expressiveness of the nursing diagnosis axis of a newly implemented interface terminology by cross-mapping with the NANDA-I taxonomy. Design/Methods: The study applied a descriptive design, using a cross-sectional, bidirectional mapping strategy. The sample included 728 concepts from both vocabularies. Concept cross-mapping was carried out to identify one-to-one, negative, and hierarchical connections. The analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics. Results: Agreement of the raters" mapping achieved 97%. More than 60% of the nursing diagnosis concepts in the NANDA-I taxonomy were mapped to concepts in the diagnosis axis of the new interface terminology; 71.1% were reversely mapped. Conclusions: Main results for outcome measures suggest that the diagnosis axis of this interface terminology meets the validity criterion of cross-mapping when mapped from and to the NANDA-I taxonomy.6 p.application/pdfengcc-by (c) Juvé Udina, Eulàlia et al., 2012http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/esDiagnòstic d'infermeriaTerminologiaNursing diagnosisTerminologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article6153952013-04-18info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess22830046