Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/122870
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKefauver, Shawn Carlisle-
dc.contributor.authorVicente García, Rubén, 1978--
dc.contributor.authorVergara Díaz, Omar-
dc.contributor.authorFernández Gallego, José A.-
dc.contributor.authorKerfal, Samir-
dc.contributor.authorLopez, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorMelichar, James P. E.-
dc.contributor.authorSerret Molins, M. Dolors-
dc.contributor.authorAraus Ortega, José Luis-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-08T14:30:32Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-08T14:30:32Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-10-
dc.identifier.issn1664-462X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/122870-
dc.description.abstractWith the commercialization and increasing availability of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) multiple rotor copters have expanded rapidly in plant phenotyping studies with their ability to provide clear, high resolution images. As such, the traditional bottleneck of plant phenotyping has shifted from data collection to data processing. Fortunately, the necessarily controlled and repetitive design of plant phenotyping allows for the development of semi-automatic computer processing tools that may sufficiently reduce the time spent in data extraction. Here we present a comparison of UAV and field based high throughput plant phenotyping (HTPP) using the free, open-source image analysis software FIJI (Fiji is just ImageJ) using RGB (conventional digital cameras), multispectral and thermal aerial imagery in combination with a matching suite of ground sensors in a study of two hybrids and one conventional barely variety with ten different nitrogen treatments, combining different fertilization levels and application schedules. A detailed correlation network for physiological traits and exploration of the data comparing between treatments and varieties provided insights into crop performance under different management scenarios. Multivariate regression models explained 77.8, 71.6, and 82.7% of the variance in yield from aerial, ground, and combined data sets, respectively.-
dc.format.extent15 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01733-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Plant Science, 2017, vol. 8, num. 1733-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01733-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Kefauver, Shawn C. et al., 2017-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)-
dc.subject.classificationOrdi-
dc.subject.classificationNitrogen-
dc.subject.otherBarley-
dc.subject.otherNitrogen-
dc.titleComparative UAV and field phenotyping to assess yield and nitrogen use efficiency in hibrid and conventional barley-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec674572-
dc.date.updated2018-06-08T14:30:33Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid29067032-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
674572.pdf2.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons