Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/130325
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCortés Serra, Verònica-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Solís, Jacob-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T10:21:42Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-14T10:21:42Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-09-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/130325-
dc.description.abstractHigh numbers of seabirds are killed annually worldwide in longline fisheries. In the Mediterranean, this mortality is seriously affecting the viability of seabird populations, in particular of the three endemic shearwaters. Even so, there is currently no specific seabird mitigation requirements for the longline fleet operating in this area. From 2013 to 2014, we assessed the efficiency and practical applicability of four mitigation measures on artisanal demersal longliners targeting European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in the western Mediterranean: night setting, tori line, weighted lines and artificial baits. We performed fifty-two pairs of experimental (with the tested mitigation measure) and control settings (without any measure), and compared their effects on seabird interactions and fish catches. In addition, we estimated the longline sink rates and the seabird access area to baited hooks in different longline configurations. Night setting reduced bycatch risk without affecting target and non-commercial fish catches. The tori line may have reduced the bycatch risk by displacing bait attacks beyond the end of the line, but at this distance shearwaters could still access to the baits and the streamers did not deter birds under calm wind conditions. Weighted lines increased sink rate, but it resulted in only a minor reduction of the seabird access window to baited hooks and led to some operational problems during the setting. Artificial baits substantially reduced commercial catches. Moreover, the seabird access to the baited hooks was influenced by the longline configuration, the setting speed and the relative position to the floats and weights. So far, night setting stands out as the best mitigation measure for reducing bycatch levels without compromising target catches in demersal longliners. Ideally, these results should be confirmed in longliners targeting species other than European hake.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196731-
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One, 2018, vol. 13, num. 5, p. e0196731-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196731-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Cortés, Verónica et al., 2018-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)-
dc.subject.classificationOcells marins-
dc.subject.classificationPesca-
dc.subject.classificationEcologia de les costes-
dc.subject.classificationMediterrània occidental-
dc.subject.otherSea birds-
dc.subject.otherFishing-
dc.subject.otherCoastal ecology-
dc.subject.otherWestern Mediterranean-
dc.titleSeabird bycatch mitigation trials in artisanal demersal longliners of the Western Mediterranean-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec684037-
dc.date.updated2019-03-14T10:21:42Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid29742148-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
684037.pdf1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons