Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing
Author: Trafimow, David
Amrhein, Valentin
Areshenkoff, Corson N.
Barrera-Causil, Carlos J.
Beh, Eric J.
Bilgiç, Yusuf K.
Bono Cabré, Roser
Bradley, Michael T.
Briggs, William M.
Cepeda-Freyre, Héctor A.
Chaigneau, Sergio E.
Ciocca, Daniel R.
Correa, Juan Carlos
de Boer, Michiel R.
Dhar, Subhra Sankar
Dolgov, Igor
Gómez Benito, Juana
Grendar, Marian
Grice, James W.
Guerrero Giménez, Martín E.
Gutiérrez, Andrés
Huedo-Medina, Tania B.
Jaffe, Klaus
Janyan, Armina
Karimnezhad, Ali
Korner-Nievergelt, Fränzi
Kosugi, Koji
Lachmair, Martin
Ledesma, Rubén D.
Limongi, Roberto
Liuzza, Marco Tullio
Lombardo, Rosaria
Marks, Michael
Meinlschmidt, Gunther
Nalborczyk, Ladislas
Nguyen, Hung T.
Ospina, Raydonal
Pérez-González, José D.
Pfister, Roland
Rahona, Juan José
Cousineau, Denis
Keywords: Tests d'hipòtesi (Estadística)
Statistical hypothesis testing
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: PeerJ
Abstract: We argue that depending on p-values to reject null hypotheses, including a recent call for changing the canonical alpha level for statistical significance from .05 to .005, is deleterious for the finding of new discoveries and the progress of science. Given that blanket and variable criterion levels both are problematic, it is sensible to dispense with significance testing altogether. There are alternatives that address study design and determining sample sizes much more directly than significance testing does; but none of the statistical tools should replace significance testing as the new magic method giving clear-cut mechanical answers. Inference should not be based on single studies at all, but on cumulative evidence from multiple independent studies. When evaluating the strength of the evidence, we should consider, for example, auxiliary assumptions, the strength of the experimental design, or implications for applications. To boil all this down to a binary decision based on a p-value threshold of .05, .01, .005, or anything else, is not acceptable.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a:
It is part of: PeerJ, 2017, vol. 5, p. e3411v3
Related resource:
ISSN: 2167-8359
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
677902.pdf283.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons