Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/170729
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVásconez, Jeanneth-
dc.contributor.authorPeró Gascón, Roger-
dc.contributor.authorGiménez López, Estela-
dc.contributor.authorBenavente Moreno, Fernando J. (Julián)-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T09:43:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-16T05:10:20Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-16-
dc.identifier.issn0039-9140-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/170729-
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates zwitterionic-hydrophilic interaction capillary liquid chromatography (capZIC-HILIC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) with ultraviolet (UV) and mass spectrometry (MS) detection for the direct, label-free and multiplex analysis of microribonucleic acids (miRNAs). CapZIC-HILIC-UV and CE-UV methods were first optimized, resulting in similar separations for a mixture of three miRNAs (hsa-iso-miR-16-5p, hsa-let-7g-5p, and hsa-miR-21-5p) but with reversal of elution/migration orders and small differences in repeatability, linearity, limit of detection (LOD) and separation efficiency. The established UV methods were transferred and validated in these terms with mass spectrometry (MS) detection, which allowed identifying the miRNAs and characterizing their post-transcriptional modifications. LOD by capZIC-HILIC-MS was 1 µM of miRNA, around 5 times lower than by CE-MS due to the analyte dilution with the sheathflow CE-MS interface and to the slightly increased abundance of alkali metals adducts in the CE-MS mass spectra. In addition, the suction effect promoted by the nebulizer gas in CE-MS negatively affected the already compromised separations. In contrast, CE-MS showed superior repeatabilities with spiked serum samples, as well as reduced costs, extended capillary column durabilities and shorter conditioning times. The comparison of the different methods allows disclosing the current advantages and disadvantages of capZIC-HILIC and CE for the analysis of miRNA biomarkers.-
dc.format.extent37 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121263-
dc.relation.ispartofTalanta, 2020, vol. 219, p. 121263-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121263-
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier B.V., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Enginyeria Química i Química Analítica)-
dc.subject.classificationElectroforesi capil·lar-
dc.subject.classificationMarcadors bioquímics-
dc.subject.classificationEspectrometria de masses-
dc.subject.otherCapillary electrophoresis-
dc.subject.otherBiochemical markers-
dc.subject.otherMass spectrometry-
dc.titleComparison of capillary electrophoresis and zwitterionic-hydrophilic interaction capillary liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and mass spectrometry detection for the analysis of microRNA biomarkers-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec700943-
dc.date.updated2020-09-18T09:43:03Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Enginyeria Química i Química Analítica)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
700943.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons