Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/200906
Title: Incorporating Alternative Polygenic Risk Scores into the BOADICEA Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model
Author: Mavaddat, Nasim
Ficorella, Lorenzo
Carver, Tim
Lee, Andrew
Cunningham, Alex P.
Lush, Michael
Dennis, Joe
Tischkowitz, Marc
Downes, Kate
Hu, Donglei
Hahnen, Eric
Schmutzler, Rita K.
Stockley, Tracy L.
Downs, Gregory S.
Zhang, Tong
Chiarelli, Anna M.
Bojesen, Stig E.
Liu, Cong
Chung, Wendy K.
Pardo Muñoz, Mònica
Feliubadaló i Elorza, Maria Lídia
Balmaña, Judith
Simard, Jacques
Antoniou, Antonis C.
Easton, Douglas F.
Keywords: Càncer de mama
Factors de risc en les malalties
Breast cancer
Risk factors in diseases
Issue Date: 13-Jan-2023
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Abstract: Background: The multifactorial risk prediction model BOADI-CEA enables identification of women at higher or lower risk of developing breast cancer. BOADICEA models genetic susceptibility in terms of the effects of rare variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes and a polygenic component, decomposed into an unmeasured and a measured component -the polygenic risk score (PRS). The current version was developed using a 313 SNP PRS. Here, we evaluated approaches to incorporating this PRS and alternative PRS in BOADICEA.Methods: The mean, SD, and proportion of the overall polygenic component explained by the PRS (a2) need to be estimated. a was estimated using logistic regression, where the age-specific log-OR is constrained to be a function of the age-dependent polygenic relative risk in BOADICEA; and using a retrospective likelihood (RL) approach that models, in addition, the unmeasured polygenic component.Results: Parameters were computed for 11 PRS, including 6 variations of the 313 SNP PRS used in clinical trials and imple-mentation studies. The logistic regression approach underestimates a, as compared with the RL estimates. The RL a estimates were very close to those obtained by assuming proportionality to the OR per 1 SD, with the constant of proportionality estimated using the 313 SNP PRS. Small variations in the SNPs included in the PRS can lead to large differences in the mean.Conclusions: BOADICEA can be readily adapted to different PRS in a manner that maintains consistency of the model.Impact : The methods described facilitate comprehensive breast cancer risk assessment.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0756
It is part of: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2023, vol. 32, num. 3, p. 422-427
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/200906
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0756
ISSN: 1538-7755
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
epi-22-0756.pdf631.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons