Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/203256
Title: Information delay of significant bloodstream isolates and patient mortality: A retrospective analysis of 6,225 adult patients with bloodstream infection
Author: Fidalgo, Berta
Morata, Laura
Cardozo, Celia
Río, Ana del
Morales, Javier
Fernández Pittol, Mariana
Martinez, José Antonio
Mensa, Josep
Vila, Jordi
Soriano, Alex
Casals Pascual, Climent
Keywords: Septicèmia
Etiologia
Septicemia
Etiology
Issue Date: 26-Apr-2023
Publisher: Oxford Academic
Abstract: A bloodstream infection is a life-threatening condition. Rapid reporting of actionable microbiological results is critical for patient management. Delays in reporting this information to the infectious diseases specialist are associated with an increased odds of death. Background Our aim in this study was to evaluate the clinical and prognostic impact of communicating microbiological information in real time for adult patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 6225 clinical episodes of bacteremia in a teaching hospital from January 2013 to December 2019. Bacteremia-associated mortality was compared when blood culture results were relayed to the infectious diseases specialist (IDS) in real time and periods when results were relayed the following morning. The impact of information availability using mortality at 30 days was used as the main outcome of the study. Results The initial analysis (all microorganisms included) did not show an association of mortality and information delay to the IDS (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], .99-1.42). However, information delay of BSIs caused by fast-growing microorganisms such as Enterobacterales was associated with a significant increase in the odds of death at 30 days both in the univariate (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.30-2.38) and multivariate analysis (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.50-3.30). Similar results were found with mortality at 14 days and 7 days in the univariate (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08-2.20 and OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.03-2.37, respectively) and the multivariate analysis (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.27-3.32 and OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.09-3.40, respectively). Conclusions Information delivered in real time has prognostic relevance and is likely to improve survival of patients with documented BSIs. Future studies should address the prognostic impact of adequate resource allocation (microbiologist/IDS with 24/7 coverage) in BSIs.
Note: Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad243
It is part of: Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 77, num. 5, p. 680–686,
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/203256
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad243
ISSN: 1537-6591
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
6.Fidalgo_B_Clinic Infect Diseas_2023_PostPrint.pdf532.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.