Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/107269
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConde Sala, Josep Lluís-
dc.contributor.authorTurró-Garriga, Oriol-
dc.contributor.authorPortellano Ortiz, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorViñas-Diez, Vanesa-
dc.contributor.authorGascón-Bayarri, Jordi-
dc.contributor.authorReñé Ramírez, Ramon-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-22T17:25:34Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-22T17:25:34Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-22-
dc.identifier.issn1387-2877-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/107269-
dc.description.abstractThe objective was to analyze the factors that influence self-perceived quality of life (QoL) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), contrasting two different longitudinal models. A total of 127 patients were followed up over 24 months. The instruments applied were: Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale (QoL-AD), Geriatric Depression Scale-15, Anosognosia Questionnaire-Dementia, Disability Assessment in Dementia, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and the Mini Mental State Examination. Two models for grouping patients were tested: 1) Baseline score on the QoL-AD (QoL-Baseline), and 2) Difference in QoL-AD score between baseline and follow-up (QoL-Change). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to analyze longitudinal data, and multinomial regression analyses were performed. Over the follow-up period the QoL-Baseline model showed greater variability between groups (Wald χ2 = 172.3, p < 0.001) than did the QoL-Change model (Wald χ2 = 1.7, p = 0.427). In the QoL-Baseline model the predictive factors were greater depression (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.45) and lower functional ability (OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85-0.99) for the Low QoL group (< 33 QoL-AD), and less depression (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.88), more anosognosia (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.13), and fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.91-0.99) for the High-QoL group (>37 QoL-AD). The model based on baseline scores (QoL-Baseline) was better than the QoL-Change model in terms of identifying trajectories and predictors of QoL in AD.-
dc.format.extent14 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherIOS Press-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160040-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Alzheimer's Disease, 2016, vol. 52, num. 3, p. 999-1012-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160040-
dc.rights(c) Conde Sala, Josep Lluís et al., 2016-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Cognició, Desenvolupament i Psicologia de l'Educació)-
dc.subject.classificationMalaltia d'Alzheimer-
dc.subject.classificationSatisfacció dels pacients-
dc.subject.classificationMètode longitudinal-
dc.subject.otherAlzheimer's disease-
dc.subject.otherPatient satisfaction-
dc.subject.otherLongitudinal method-
dc.titleSelf-perceived quality of life among patients with Alzheimer's disease: Two longitudinal models of analysis-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec657264-
dc.date.updated2017-02-22T17:25:35Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid27079721-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Cognició, Desenvolupament i Psicologia de l'Educació)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
657264.pdf306.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.