Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/162576
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJörges, Björn-
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Moliner, Joan-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-27T11:43:47Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-27T11:43:47Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-01-
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/162576-
dc.description.abstractThere is evidence that humans rely on an earth gravity (9.81 m/s²) prior for a series of tasks involving perception and action, the reason being that gravity helps predict future positions of moving objects. Eye-movements in turn are partially guided by predictions about observed motion. Thus, the question arises whether knowledge about gravity is also used to guide eye-movements: If humans rely on a representation of earth gravity for the control of eye movements, earth-gravity-congruent motion should elicit improved visual pursuit. In a pre-registered experiment, we presented participants (n = 10) with parabolic motion governed by six different gravities (−1/0.7/0.85/1/1.15/1.3 g), two initial vertical velocities and two initial horizontal velocities in a 3D environment. Participants were instructed to follow the target with their eyes. We tracked their gaze and computed the visual gain (velocity of the eyes divided by velocity of the target) as proxy for the quality of pursuit. An LMM analysis with gravity condition as fixed effect and intercepts varying per subject showed that the gain was lower for −1 g than for 1 g (by −0.13, SE = 0.005). This model was significantly better than a null model without gravity as fixed effect (p < 0.001), supporting our hypothesis. A comparison of 1 g and the remaining gravity conditions revealed that 1.15 g (by 0.043, SE = 0.005) and 1.3 g (by 0.065, SE = 0.005) were associated with lower gains, while 0.7 g (by 0.054, SE = 0.005) and 0.85 g (by 0.029, SE = 0.005) were associated with higher gains. This model was again significantly better than a null model (p < 0.001), contradicting our hypothesis. Post-hoc analyses reveal that confounds in the 0.7/0.85/1/1.15/1.3 g condition may be responsible for these contradicting results. Despite these discrepancies, our data thus provide some support for the hypothesis that internalized knowledge about earth gravity guides eye movements.-
dc.format.extent13 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50512-6-
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports, 2019, vol. 9, p. 14094-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50512-6-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Jörges, Björn et al., 2019-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Cognició, Desenvolupament i Psicologia de l'Educació)-
dc.subject.classificationGravetat-
dc.subject.classificationMoviments oculars-
dc.subject.classificationVisualització tridimensional-
dc.subject.otherGravity-
dc.subject.otherEye movements-
dc.subject.otherThree-dimensional display systems-
dc.titleEarth-gravity congruent motion facilitates ocular control for pursuit of parabolic trajectories.-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec697448-
dc.date.updated2020-05-27T11:43:47Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid31575901-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Cognició, Desenvolupament i Psicologia de l'Educació)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
697448.pdf3.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons