Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/173523
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZurita Hernández, Jorge Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorAyuso Montero, Raúl-
dc.contributor.authorCuartero Balañá, Meritxell-
dc.contributor.authorWillaert Jiménez-Pajarero, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Gomis, Jordi-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T12:13:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-29T12:13:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-23-
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/173523-
dc.description.abstractBackground: We compared photogrammetry-assessed body posture between young adults with and without unilateral posterior crossbite (UPCB). Assessments were controlled by vision, mandibular position and sitting/standing position. In addition, we aimed to determine the relationship between UPCB laterality and the direction of body posture using photogrammetry and a static postural platform. Methods: Adults with natural dentition, with and without UPCB, were enrolled. Static body posture was assessed by photogrammetry based on horizontal acromial alignment and horizontal anterior-superior iliac spine (ASIS) alignment. Frontal photographs were taken with participants asked to open or close their eyes and hold their jaws at rest, at an intercuspal position, and at left or right lateral positions. Distribution of foot pressure was recorded using a static postural platform at different visual input and mandibular positions. General linear models with repeated measures were used to assess the effect of the various within- and between-subject factors. Results: In total, 36 adults (left UPCB = 12; Right UPCB = 6; controls = 18) participated. There were significant differences between the control and UPCB groups in horizontal alignment at the acromion (p = 0.035) and ASIS (p = 0.026) levels when controlled by visual input and mandibular position. No significant differences in horizontal alignment or foot pressure distribution were observed by laterality in the UPCB group. Conclusion: The presence of UPCB affects static body posture, but the side of crossbite is not related to the direction of effect on static body posture.-
dc.format.extent10 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155303-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, num. 15, p. 5303-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155303-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Zurita Hernández, Jorge et al., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)-
dc.subject.classificationOclusió dental-
dc.subject.classificationPostura humana-
dc.subject.otherDental occlusion-
dc.subject.otherPosture-
dc.titleRelationship between unilateral posterior crossbite and human static body posture-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec702706-
dc.date.updated2021-01-29T12:13:04Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid32717988-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
702706.pdf1.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons