Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178232
Title: Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
Author: Barroso, María
Perez Fernandez, Silvia
Vila, Maria del Mar
Zomeño Fajardo, María Dolores
Martí Lluch, Ruth
Cordón Granados, Ferran
Ramos, Rafel
Elosua, Roberto
Degano, Irene R.
Fitó Colomer, Montserrat
Cabezas, Carmen
Salvador i Castell, Gemma
Castell, Conxa
Grau, Maria
Keywords: Malalties cardiovasculars
Epidemiologia
Cardiovascular diseases
Epidemiology
Issue Date: 10-May-2018
Abstract: Background: The validity of a cardiovascular risk self-screening method was assessed. The results obtained for self-measurement of blood pressure, a point-of-care system's assessment of lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin, and a self-administered questionnaire (sex, age, diabetes, tobacco consumption) were compared with the standard screening (gold standard) conducted by a health professional. Methods: Crossover clinical trial on a population-based sample from Girona (north-eastern Spain), aged 35-74, with no cardiovascular disease at recruitment. Participants were randomized to one of the two risk assessment sequences (standard screening followed by self-screening or vice versa). Cardiovascular risk was estimated with the Framingham-REGICOR function. Concordance between methods was estimated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were estimated, considering 5% cardiovascular risk as the cutoff point. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration #NCT02373319. Clinical Research Ethic Committee of the Parc de Salut Mar Registration #2014/5815/I. Results: The median cardiovascular risk in men was 2.56 (interquartile range: 1.42-4.35) estimated by standard methods and 2.25 (1.28-4.07) by self-screening with ICC=0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.93). In women, the cardiovascular risk was 1.14 (0.61-2.10) by standard methods and 1.10 (0.56-2.00) by self-screening, with ICC=0.89 (0.87-0.90). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the self-screening method were 0.74 (0.63-0.82), 0.97 (0.95-0.99), 0.86 (0.77-0.93), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96), respectively, in men. In women, these values were 0.50 (0.30-0.70), 0.99 (0.98-1), 0.81 (0.54-0.96), and 0.97 (0.95-0.99), respectively. Conclusion: The self-screening method for assessing cardiovascular risk provided similar results to the standard method. Self-screening had high clinical performance to rule out intermediate or high cardiovascular risk.
Note: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S158358
It is part of: Clinical Epidemiology, 2018, vol. 10, p. 549-560
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178232
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S158358
ISSN: 1179-1349
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
696065.pdf400.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.