Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178508
Title: Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure
Author: McMurray, John J.V.
Packer, Milton
Desai, Akshay S.
Gong, Jianjian
Lefkowitz, Martin P.
Rizkala, Adel R.
Rouleau, Jean L.
Shi, Victor C.
Solomon, Scott D.
Swedberg, Karl
Zile, Michael R.
Comín Colet, Josep
PARADIGM-HF Investigators and Committees
Keywords: Angiotensines
Insuficiència cardíaca
Ús terapèutic
Angiotensins
Heart failure
Therapeutic use
Issue Date: 11-Sep-2014
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Abstract: Background: we compared the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 with enalapril in patients who had heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. In previous studies, enalapril improved survival in such patients. Methods: in this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 8442 patients with class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less to receive either LCZ696 (at a dose of 200 mg twice daily) or enalapril (at a dose of 10 mg twice daily), in addition to recommended therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure, but the trial was designed to detect a difference in the rates of death from cardiovascular causes. Results: the trial was stopped early, according to prespecified rules, after a median follow-up of 27 months, because the boundary for an overwhelming benefit with LCZ696 had been crossed. At the time of study closure, the primary outcome had occurred in 914 patients (21.8%) in the LCZ696 group and 1117 patients (26.5%) in the enalapril group (hazard ratio in the LCZ696 group, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.87; P<0.001). A total of 711 patients (17.0%) receiving LCZ696 and 835 patients (19.8%) receiving enalapril died (hazard ratio for death from any cause, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.93; P<0.001); of these patients, 558 (13.3%) and 693 (16.5%), respectively, died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.89; P<0.001). As compared with enalapril, LCZ696 also reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure by 21% (P<0.001) and decreased the symptoms and physical limitations of heart failure (P=0.001). The LCZ696 group had higher proportions of patients with hypotension and nonserious angioedema but lower proportions with renal impairment, hyperkalemia, and cough than the enalapril group. Conclusions: LCZ696 was superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of death and of hospitalization for heart failure. (Funded by Novartis; PARADIGM-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01035255).
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1409077
It is part of: New England Journal of Medicine, 2014, vol. 371, num. 11, p. 993-1004
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178508
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1409077
ISSN: 0028-4793
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
674831.pdf645.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.