Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/184044
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnton, Alfonso-
dc.contributor.authorNolivos, Karen-
dc.contributor.authorPazos, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorFatti, Gianluca-
dc.contributor.authorHerranz, Alejandra-
dc.contributor.authorAyala-Fuentes, Miriam Eleonora-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Prats, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorPeral, Oscar-
dc.contributor.authorVega-Lopez, Zaida-
dc.contributor.authorMonleón Getino, Toni-
dc.contributor.authorMorilla-Grasa, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorComas, Merce-
dc.contributor.authorCastells, Xavier-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T15:57:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-11T15:57:38Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-01-
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/184044-
dc.description.abstractt: Purpose: To evaluate interobserver and intertest agreement between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and retinography in the detection of glaucoma through a telemedicine program. Methods: A stratified sample of 4113 individuals was randomly selected, and those who accepted underwent examination including visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), non-mydriatic retinography, and imaging using a portable OCT device. Participants' data and images were uploaded and assessed by 16 ophthalmologists on a deferred basis. Two independent evaluations were performed for all participants. Agreement between methods was assessed using the kappa coefficient and the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). We analyzed potential factors possibly influencing the level of agreement. Results: The final sample comprised 1006 participants. Of all suspected glaucoma cases (n = 201), 20.4% were identified in retinographs only, 11.9% in OCT images only, 46.3% in both, and 21.4% were diagnosed based on other data. Overall interobserver agreement outcomes were moderate to good with a kappa coefficient of 0.37 and a PABAK index of 0.58. Higher values were obtained by experienced evaluators (kappa = 0.61; PABAK = 0.82). Kappa and PABAK values between OCT and photographs were 0.52 and 0.82 for the first evaluation. Conclusion: In a telemedicine screening setting, interobserver agreement on diagnosis was moderate but improved with greater evaluator expertise.-
dc.format.extent13 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153337-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicine, 2021, vol. 10, num. 15, p. 1-13-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153337-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Anton, Alfonso et al., 2021-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)-
dc.subject.classificationCribratge-
dc.subject.classificationGlaucoma-
dc.subject.classificationTomografia de coherència òptica-
dc.subject.classificationTelecomunicació en medicina-
dc.subject.otherMedical screening-
dc.subject.otherGlaucoma-
dc.subject.otherOptical coherence tomography-
dc.subject.otherTelecommunication in medicine-
dc.titleInterobserver and Intertest Agreement in Telemedicine Glaucoma Screening with Optic Disk Photos and Optical Coherence Tomography-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec717293-
dc.date.updated2022-03-11T15:57:38Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
717293.pdf1.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons