Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/184068
Title: Combining schizophrenia and depression polygenic risk scores improves the genetic prediction of lithium response in bipolar disorder patients
Author: Schubert, Klaus Oliver
Thalamuthu, Anbupalam
Amare, Azmeraw T.
Frank, Josef
Streit, Fabian
Adl, Mazda
Akula, Nirmala
Akiyama, Kazufumi
Ardau, Raffaella
Arias Sampériz, Bárbara
Aubry, Jean-Michel
Backlund, Lena
Bhattacharjee, Abesh Kumar
Bellivier, Frank
Benabarre, Antonio
Bengesser, Susanne
Biernacka, Joanna M.
Birner, Armin
Marie-Claire, Cynthia
Cearns, Micah
Cervantes, Pablo
Chen, Hsi-Chung
Chillotti, Caterina
Cichon, Sven
Clark, Scott R.
Cruceanu, Cristiana
Czerski, Piotr M.
Dalkner, Nina
Dayer, Alexandre
Degenhardt, Franziska
Del Zompo, Maria
DePaulo, J. Raymond
Étain, Bruno
Falkai, Peter
Forstner, Andreas J.
Frisen, Louise
Frye, Mark A.
Jiménez Martínez, Ester
Mitjans Niubó, Marina
Vieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963-
Keywords: Esquizofrènia
Trastorn bipolar
Liti
Depressió psíquica
Schizophrenia
Manic-depressive illness
Lithium
Mental depression
Issue Date: 29-Nov-2021
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Abstract: Lithium is the gold standard therapy for Bipolar Disorder (BD) but its effectiveness differs widely between individuals. The molecular mechanisms underlying treatment response heterogeneity are not well understood, and personalized treatment in BD remains elusive. Genetic analyses of the lithium treatment response phenotype may generate novel molecular insights into lithium's therapeutic mechanisms and lead to testable hypotheses to improve BD management and outcomes. We used fixed effect meta-analysis techniques to develop meta-analytic polygenic risk scores (MET-PRS) from combinations of highly correlated psychiatric traits, namely schizophrenia (SCZ), major depression (MD) and bipolar disorder (BD). We compared the effects of cross-disorder MET-PRS and single genetic trait PRS on lithium response. For the PRS analyses, we included clinical data on lithium treatment response and genetic information for n = 2283 BD cases from the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLi+Gen; www.ConLiGen.org). Higher SCZ and MD PRSs were associated with poorer lithium treatment response whereas BD-PRS had no association with treatment outcome. The combined MET2-PRS comprising of SCZ and MD variants (MET2-PRS) and a model using SCZ and MD-PRS sequentially improved response prediction, compared to single-disorder PRS or to a combined score using all three traits (MET3-PRS). Patients in the highest decile for MET2-PRS loading had 2.5 times higher odds of being classified as poor responders than patients with the lowest decile MET2-PRS scores. An exploratory functional pathway analysis of top MET2-PRS variants was conducted. Findings may inform the development of future testing strategies for personalized lithium prescribing in BD.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01702-2
It is part of: Translational Psychiatry, 2021, vol. 11, num. 606
Correcció: Translational Psychiatry, 2022, vol. 12:278
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/184068
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01702-2
ISSN: 2158-3188
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut de Neurociències (UBNeuro))
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
716514.pdfOriginal article2.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
724427.pdfCorrection101.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons