Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/185441
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLucas-Taulé, Ernest-
dc.contributor.authorBofarull-Ballús, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorLlaquet, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorMercadé Bellido, Montserrat-
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Alfaro, Federico-
dc.contributor.authorGargallo Albiol, Jordi-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-09T15:51:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-09T15:51:03Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/185441-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Tooth autotransplantation is defined as the surgical repositioning of an autogenous tooth in another surgical site within the same individual. Aim: The aim of this research was to analyze the outcome of tooth transplantation using immature donor teeth compared with closed apex teeth and to compare differences between donor tooth positions on the arch. Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were performed in different databases, including the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE), EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Central (CENTRAL), and the digital library of the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC University) from 1978 to March 2021. Studies were selected when they fulfilled the following criteria: only human prospective clinical studies, minimum sample size of 10 patients, minimum follow-up of 1 year, studies reporting or with at least deducible data on survival rates, immediate tooth autotransplantation with completed or incomplete root formation, and publications in the English language. A meta-analysis of random effects was developed to estimate the global effect measure of the survival rate, success rate, and root resorption involving the total sample, as well as open- and closed-apex groups. Results: Twenty-four articles were eligible for analysis. The Cohen's kappa corresponding to this review was 0.87, and the risk assessment was considered low-moderate for the included studies. Overall survival and success rates were 95.9% and 89.4%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 4 years and an overall mean age of 25.2 ± 12.3 years. Closed apex teeth showed a survival rate of 3.9% lower than that of open apex teeth. Higher complication rates were found for both inflammatory external root resorption and replacement root resorption in the closed-apex group, without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: Tooth autotransplantation is a viable treatment alternative, regardless of the apical condition, with high survival and success rates after a mean follow-up of 4 years. Open-apex donor teeth could be considered the gold-standard option, showing lower complication rates when compared to closed-apex donor teeth. Future randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to examine the long-term prognosis of this technique.-
dc.format.extent18 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093379-
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials, 2022, vol. 15, p. 3379-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093379-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Lucas-Taulé, Ernest et al., 2022-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)-
dc.subject.classificationAutotrasplantament-
dc.subject.classificationPròtesis dentals-
dc.subject.classificationArrel de la dent-
dc.subject.classificationMetaanàlisi-
dc.subject.otherAutotransplantation-
dc.subject.otherDental prosthesis-
dc.subject.otherTooth root-
dc.subject.otherMeta-analysis-
dc.titleDoes root development status affect the outcome of tooth autotransplantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec723338-
dc.date.updated2022-05-09T15:51:03Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
723338.pdf609.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons