Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/194592
Title: Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Treatment (OPAT) vs. Hospitalization for Infective Endocarditis: Validation of the OPAT-GAMES criteria
Author: Pericàs, Juan M.
Llopis, Jaume
Muñoz, Patricia
González-Ramallo, Víctor
García-Leoni, M. Eugenia
de Alarcón, Arístides
Luque, Rafael
Fariñas, M. Carmen
Goenaga, Miguel Á.
Hernández-Meneses, Marta
Nicolás, David
Ramos-Martínez, Antonio
Rodríguez-Esteban, M. Ángeles
Villoslada-Gelabert, Aroa
Miró Meda, José M.
GAMES Investigators
Keywords: Endocarditis
Mortalitat
Antibiòtics
Endocarditis
Mortality
Antibiotics
Issue Date: Aug-2022
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Abstract: Background: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) programs are increasingly used to manage infective endocarditis (IE), but current criteria for indicating OPAT are markedly conservative. We aimed to investigate whether more liberal criteria for indicating OPAT in IE can be safely used. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter nationwide cohort study (2008-2018). Rates of readmission, recurrences, and 1-year mortality were compared between hospital-based antibiotic treatment (HBAT) and OPAT. Risk factors for readmission and mortality in OPAT patients were investigated by logistic regression. Patients did not fulfill OPAT-GAMES (Grupos de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis en ESpaña) criteria if they had any of the following: cirrhosis, severe central nervous system emboli, undrained abscesses, severe conditions requiring cardiac surgery in nonoperable patients, severe postsurgical complications, highly difficult-to-treat microorganisms, or intravenous drug use. Results: A total of 2279 HBAT patients and 1268 OPAT patients were included. Among OPAT patients, 307 (24.2%) did not fulfill OPAT-GAMES criteria. Overall, OPAT patients presented higher rates of readmission than HBAT patients (18.2% vs 14.4%; P = .004), but no significant differences were found in the propensity analysis. Patients not fulfilling OPAT-GAMES criteria presented significantly higher rates of readmission than HBAT and OPAT-GAMES (23.8%, 14.4%, 16.4%; P < .001), whereas no significant differences were found in mortality (5.9%, 8%, 7.4%; P = .103) or recurrences (3.9%, 3.1%, 2.5%; P = .546). Not fulfilling OPAT-GAMES criteria was associated with higher risk of readmission (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.03-1.97; P = .03), whereas cardiac surgery was associated with lower risk (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.98; P = .03). Conclusions: OPAT-GAMES criteria allow identification of IE patients at higher risk of long-term complications to whom OPAT cannot be safely administered.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac442
It is part of: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2022, vol. 9, num. 9, p. 1-8
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/194592
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac442
ISSN: 2374-4235
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
725329.pdf456.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons