Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219519
Title: | Update on chelating agents in endodontic treatment: A systematic review |
Author: | Fortea, Laura Sanz-Serrano, Diana Luz, Luciana-Batista Bardini, Giulia Mercadé Bellido, Montserrat |
Keywords: | Endodòncia Ions metàl·lics Ressenyes sistemàtiques (Investigació mèdica) Endodontics Metal ions Systematic reviews (Medical research) |
Issue Date: | Apr-2024 |
Publisher: | Medicina Oral SL |
Abstract: | Background: The aim of this review was to assess the evidence regarding the most commonly used chelating agents in terms of efficacy, erosive potential, cytotoxicity, interaction, antimicrobial effect, impact on sealers adhesion, and release of growth factors. Material and methods: MEDLINE (PubMed) database, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched up to January 14, 2023, including studies with one or more of the following chelating agents: 17% EDTA, 9% and 18% HEDP, 10% and 20% citric acid, 2%-2.25% peracetic acid and 7% maleic acid. In addition, the reference lists of all selected articles were also checked to identify additional relevant studies. Articles published in English and available in full-text were selected. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified CONSORT checklist guide and the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Results: The electronic search yielded 538 citations, 56 of which were included. The articles included had moderate and low evidence values. Among 56 articles included, 55 were in vitro studies and one was a randomized clinical trial. Among the in vitro studies, 15 evaluated efficacy and dentin erosion, 12 evaluated interaction with other endodontic irrigants, 9 tested antimicrobial effect, 4 evaluated cytotoxicity in hamster and rat lung cells, 9 evaluated intervention in adhesion of filling materials and 8 focused on release of growth factors and on behavior of stem cells in regenerative endodontic. The RCT tested antimicrobial effect. Conclusions: 17% EDTA is the most effective in smear layer removal and in releasing growth factors on regenerative endodontics. However, the current incorporation of 9% and 18% etidronic acid has shown optimal results due to its compatibility with sodium hypochlorite and its capability on avoiding smear layer formation through a continuous chelation action. Despite these preliminary findings, methodological standardization between studies is required and in vivo studies are necessary to confirm in vitro studies. Key words:Chelating Agents, Smear Layer, Systematic Review, Endodontics, Root Canal Irrigants. |
Note: | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60989 |
It is part of: | Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2024, vol. 16, num.4, p. 516-538 |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219519 |
Related resource: | https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60989 |
ISSN: | 1989-5488 |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia) Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL)) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
858549.pdf | 1.67 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.