Carregant...
Miniatura

Tipus de document

Article

Versió

Versió publicada

Data de publicació

Llicència de publicació

cc-by (c) Carreras, Núria et al., 2022
Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/187391

Comparison of HE4, CA125, ROMA and CPH-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Tumors

Títol de la revista

Director/Tutor

ISSN de la revista

Títol del volum

Resum

(1) OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of CA125, HE4, ROMA index and CPH-I index to preoperatively identify epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) or metastatic cancer in the ovary (MCO). (2) METHODS: single center retrospective study, including women with a diagnosis of adnexal mass. We obtained the AUC, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were of HE4, CA125, ROMA and CPH-I for the diagnosis of EOC and MCO. Subgroup analysis for women harboring adnexal masses with inconclusive diagnosis of malignancy by ultrasound features and Stage I EOC was performed. (3) RESULTS: 1071 patients were included, 852 (79.6%) presented benign/borderline tumors and 219 (20.4%) presented EOC/MCO. AUC for HE4 was higher than for CA125 (0.91 vs. 0.87). No differences were seen between AUC of ROMA and CPH-I, but they were both higher than HE4 AUC. None of the tumor markers alone achieved a sensitivity of 90%; HE4 was highly specific (93.5%). ROMA showed a sensitivity and specificity of 91.1% and 84.6% respectively, while CPH-I showed a sensitivity of 91.1% with 79.2% specificity. For patients with inconclusive diagnosis of malignancy by ultrasound features and with Stage I EOC, ROMA showed the best diagnostic performance (4) CONCLUSIONS: ROMA and CPH-I perform better than tumor markers alone to identify patients harboring EOC or MCO. They can be helpful to assess the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses, especially in cases where ultrasonographic diagnosis is challenging (stage I EOC, inconclusive diagnosis of malignancy by ultrasound features).

Citació

Citació

CARRERAS-DIEGUEZ, Nuria, GLICKMAN, Ariel, MUNMANY, Meritxell, CASANOVAS, Georgina, AGUSTÍ, Núria, DÍAZ FEIJOO, Berta, SACO, Adela, SÁNCHEZ HOYO, Beatriz, GABA, Lydia, ROVIROSA CASINO, Angeles, PAHISA FÁBREGAS, Jaume, FERNÁNDEZ GALÁN, Esther, TORNÉ BLADÉ, Aureli, FUSTÉ, Pere. Comparison of HE4, CA125, ROMA and CPH-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Tumors. _Diagnostics_. 2022. Vol. 12, núm. 1, pàgs. 226. [consulta: 21 de gener de 2026]. ISSN: 2075-4418. [Disponible a: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/187391]

Exportar metadades

JSON - METS

Compartir registre