A two-question tool to assess the risk of repeated falls in the elderly

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorGálvez-Barrón, César
dc.contributor.authorNarvaiza, Leire
dc.contributor.authorMiñarro Alonso, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorValldosera, Esther
dc.contributor.authorGonzalo León, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorNg, Thalia
dc.contributor.authorSanguino, María Jesús
dc.contributor.authorYuste, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-23T12:05:45Z
dc.date.available2017-05-23T12:05:45Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-10
dc.date.updated2017-05-23T12:05:45Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Older adults' perception of their own risk of fall has never been included into screening tools. The goal of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of questions on subjects' self-perception of their own risk of fall. Methods This prospective study was conducted on a probabilistic sample of 772 Spanish community-dwelling older adults, who were followed-up for a one year period. At a baseline visit, subjects were asked about their recent history of falls (question 1: 'Have you fallen in the last 6 months?'), as well as on their perception of their own risk of fall by using two questions (question 2: 'Do you think you may fall in the next few months?' possible answers: yes/no; question 3: 'What is the probability that you fall in the next few months?' possible answers: low/intermediate/high). The follow-up consisted of quarterly telephone calls, where the number of falls occurred in that period was recorded. Results A short questionnaire built with questions 1 and 3 showed 70% sensitivity (95% CI: 56%-84%), 72% specificity (95% CI: 68%-76%) and 0.74 area under the ROC curve (95% CI: 0.66-0.82) for prediction of repeated falls in the subsequent year. Conclusions The estimation of one's own risk of fall has predictive validity for the occurrence of repeated falls in older adults. A short questionnaire including a question on perception of one's own risk of fall and a question on the recent history of falls had good predictive validity.
dc.format.extent12 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec671444
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.pmid28489888
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/111443
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176703
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One, 2017, vol. 12, num. 5, p. e0176703-e0176703
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176703
dc.rightscc-by (c) Rodríguez-Molinero, Alejandro et al., 2017
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)
dc.subject.classificationPersones grans
dc.subject.classificationCaigudes (Accidents)
dc.subject.otherOlder people
dc.subject.otherFalls (Accidents)
dc.titleA two-question tool to assess the risk of repeated falls in the elderly
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
671444.pdf
Mida:
953.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format