Document type
ArticleVersion
Published versionPublication date
Publication license
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/149084
Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing
Journal Title
Director/Tutor
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Related resource
Abstract
We argue that depending on p-values to reject null hypotheses, including a recent call for changing the canonical alpha level for statistical significance from .05 to .005, is deleterious for the finding of new discoveries and the progress of science. Given that blanket and variable criterion levels both are problematic, it is sensible to dispense with significance testing altogether. There are alternatives that address study design and determining sample sizes much more directly than significance testing does; but none of the statistical tools should replace significance testing as the new magic method giving clear-cut mechanical answers. Inference should not be based on single studies at all, but on cumulative evidence from multiple independent studies. When evaluating the strength of the evidence, we should consider, for example, auxiliary assumptions, the strength of the experimental design, or implications for applications. To boil all this down to a binary decision based on a p-value threshold of .05, .01, .005, or anything else, is not acceptable.
Subject (English)
Citation
Citation
TRAFIMOW, David, et al. Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing. PeerJ. 2017. Vol. 5, num. e3411v3. ISSN 2167-8359. [consulted: 8 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/149084