Comparison of capillary electrophoresis and zwitterionic-hydrophilic interaction capillary liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and mass spectrometry detection for the analysis of microRNA biomarkers

dc.contributor.authorVásconez, Jeanneth
dc.contributor.authorPeró Gascón, Roger
dc.contributor.authorGiménez López, Estela
dc.contributor.authorBenavente Moreno, Fernando J. (Julián)
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T09:43:03Z
dc.date.available2022-06-16T05:10:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-16
dc.date.updated2020-09-18T09:43:03Z
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates zwitterionic-hydrophilic interaction capillary liquid chromatography (capZIC-HILIC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) with ultraviolet (UV) and mass spectrometry (MS) detection for the direct, label-free and multiplex analysis of microribonucleic acids (miRNAs). CapZIC-HILIC-UV and CE-UV methods were first optimized, resulting in similar separations for a mixture of three miRNAs (hsa-iso-miR-16-5p, hsa-let-7g-5p, and hsa-miR-21-5p) but with reversal of elution/migration orders and small differences in repeatability, linearity, limit of detection (LOD) and separation efficiency. The established UV methods were transferred and validated in these terms with mass spectrometry (MS) detection, which allowed identifying the miRNAs and characterizing their post-transcriptional modifications. LOD by capZIC-HILIC-MS was 1 µM of miRNA, around 5 times lower than by CE-MS due to the analyte dilution with the sheathflow CE-MS interface and to the slightly increased abundance of alkali metals adducts in the CE-MS mass spectra. In addition, the suction effect promoted by the nebulizer gas in CE-MS negatively affected the already compromised separations. In contrast, CE-MS showed superior repeatabilities with spiked serum samples, as well as reduced costs, extended capillary column durabilities and shorter conditioning times. The comparison of the different methods allows disclosing the current advantages and disadvantages of capZIC-HILIC and CE for the analysis of miRNA biomarkers.
dc.format.extent37 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec700943
dc.identifier.issn0039-9140
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/170729
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121263
dc.relation.ispartofTalanta, 2020, vol. 219, p. 121263
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121263
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier B.V., 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Enginyeria Química i Química Analítica)
dc.subject.classificationElectroforesi capil·lar
dc.subject.classificationMarcadors bioquímics
dc.subject.classificationEspectrometria de masses
dc.subject.otherCapillary electrophoresis
dc.subject.otherBiochemical markers
dc.subject.otherMass spectrometry
dc.titleComparison of capillary electrophoresis and zwitterionic-hydrophilic interaction capillary liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and mass spectrometry detection for the analysis of microRNA biomarkers
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
700943.pdf
Mida:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format