Carregant...
Tipus de document
ArticleVersió
Versió publicadaData de publicació
Llicència de publicació
Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/69197
Economic Evaluation of an Alternative Drug to Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine as Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy
Títol de la revista
Director/Tutor
ISSN de la revista
Títol del volum
Recurs relacionat
Resum
Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy
(IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended in
HIV-negative women to avert malaria, while this relies on
cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (CTXp) in HIV-positive women.
Alternative antimalarials are required in areas where parasite
resistance to antifolate drugs is high. The cost-effectiveness
of IPTp with alternative drugs is needed to inform policy.
METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of 2-dose IPTp-mefloquine (MQ)
was compared with IPTp-SP in HIV-negative women (Benin, Gabon,
Mozambique and Tanzania). In HIV-positive women the
cost-effectiveness of 3-dose IPTp-MQ added to CTXp was compared
with CTXp alone (Kenya, Mozambique and Tanzania). The outcomes
used were maternal clinical malaria, anaemia at delivery and
non-obstetric hospital admissions. The poor tolerability to MQ
was included as the value of women's loss of working days.
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated
and threshold analysis undertaken. RESULTS: For HIV-negative
women, the ICER for IPTp-MQ versus IPTp-SP was 136.30 US$ (2012
US$) (95%CI 131.41; 141.18) per disability-adjusted life-year
(DALY) averted, or 237.78 US$ (95%CI 230.99; 244.57), depending
on whether estimates from Gabon were included or not. For
HIV-positive women, the ICER per DALY averted for IPTp-MQ added
to CTXp, versus CTXp alone was 6.96 US$ (95%CI 4.22; 9.70). In
HIV-negative women, moderate shifts of variables such as malaria
incidence, drug cost, and IPTp efficacy increased the ICERs
above the cost-effectiveness threshold. In HIV-positive women
the intervention remained cost-effective for a substantial (up
to 21 times) increase in cost per tablet. CONCLUSIONS: Addition
of IPTp with an effective antimalarial to CTXp was very
cost-effective in HIV-positive women. IPTp with an efficacious
antimalarial was more cost-effective than IPTp-SP in
HIV-negative women. However, the poor tolerability of MQ does
not favour its use as IPTp. Regardless of HIV status, prevention
of malaria in pregnancy with a highly efficacious, well
tolerated antimalarial would be cost-effective despite its high
price. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00811421; Pan
African Trials Registry PACTR2010020001429343 and
PACTR2010020001813440.
Matèries
Matèries (anglès)
Citació
Col·leccions
Citació
SICURI, Elisa, FERNANDES, Silke, MACETE, Eusebio víctor, GONZÁLEZ, Raquel, MOMBO-NGOMA, Ghyslain, MASSOUGBODJI, Achille, ABDULLA, Salim, KUWAWENARUWA, August, KATANA, Abraham, DESAI, Meghna, COT, Michel, RAMHARTER, Michael, KREMSNER, Peter g., SLUTSKER, Laurence, APONTE, John j., HANSON, Kara, MENÉNDEZ, Clara. Economic Evaluation of an Alternative Drug to Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine as Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy. _PLoS One_. 2015. Vol. 10, núm. 4, pàgs. e0125072. [consulta: 20 de gener de 2026]. ISSN: 1932-6203. [Disponible a: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/69197]