Determining effects of areca (betel) nut chewing in a prospective cohort of pregnant women in Madang Province, Papua New Guinea

dc.contributor.authorOme-Kaius, Maria
dc.contributor.authorUnger, Holger Werner
dc.contributor.authorSingirok, Dupain
dc.contributor.authorWangnapi, Regina A.
dc.contributor.authorHanieh, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorUmbers, Alexandra J.
dc.contributor.authorElizah, Julie
dc.contributor.authorSiba, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Ivo
dc.contributor.authorRogerson, Stephen John
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-04T13:41:53Z
dc.date.available2016-02-04T13:41:53Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-19
dc.date.updated2016-02-02T15:35:42Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Chewing areca nut (AN), also known as betel nut, is common in Asia and the South Pacific and the habit has been linked to a number of serious health problems including oral cancer. Use of AN in pregnancy has been associated with a reduction in mean birthweight in some studies, but this association and the relationship between AN chewing and other adverse pregnancy outcomes remain poorly understood. METHODS: We assessed the impact of AN chewing on adverse outcomes including stillbirth, low birthweight (LBW, <2,500 g) and anaemia at delivery (haemoglobin <11.0 g/dL) in a longitudinal cohort of 2,700 pregnant women residing in rural lowland Papua New Guinea (PNG) from November 2009 until February 2013. Chewing habits and participant characteristics were evaluated at first antenatal visit and women were followed until delivery. RESULTS: 83.3% [2249/2700] of pregnant women used AN, and most chewed on a daily basis (86.2% [1939/2249]. Smoking and alcohol use was reported by 18.9% (511/2700) and 5.0% (135/2688) of women, respectively. AN use was not associated with pregnancy loss or congenital abnormalities amongst women with a known pregnancy outcome (n = 2215). Analysis of 1769 birthweights did not demonstrate an association between AN and LBW (chewers: 13.7% [200/1459] vs. non-chewers: 14.5% [45/310], P = 0.87) or reduced mean birthweight (2957 g vs. 2966 g; P = 0.76). Women using AN were more likely to be anaemic (haemoglobin <11 g/dL) at delivery (75.2% [998/1314] vs. 63.9% [182/285], adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.67 [1.27, 2.20], P < 0.001). Chewers more commonly had male babies than non-chewers (46.1% [670/1455] vs. 39.8% [123/309], P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: AN chewing may contribute to anaemia. Although not associated with other adverse pregnancy outcome in this cohort gestational AN use should be discouraged, given the potential adverse effects on haemoglobin and well-established long-term health risk including oral cancer. Future research evaluating the potential association of AN use and anaemia may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01136850 (06 April 2010).
dc.format.extent9 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.issn1471-2393
dc.identifier.pmid26286026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/69259
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0615-z
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2015, vol. 15, num. 177, p. 1-9
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0615-z
dc.rightscc by (c) Ome-Kaius et al., 2015
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)
dc.subject.classificationDrogues
dc.subject.classificationComplicacions en l'embaràs
dc.subject.classificationAssaigs clínics
dc.subject.otherDrugs of abuse
dc.subject.otherComplications of pregnancy
dc.subject.otherClinical trials
dc.titleDetermining effects of areca (betel) nut chewing in a prospective cohort of pregnant women in Madang Province, Papua New Guinea
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
ome-kaius2015_1966.pdf
Mida:
531.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format