El CRAI romandrà tancat del 24 de desembre de 2025 al 6 de gener de 2026. La validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 7 de gener de 2026.
El CRAI permanecerá cerrado del 24 de diciembre de 2025 al 6 de enero de 2026. La validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 7 de enero de 2026.
From 2025-12-24 to 2026-01-06, the CRAI remain closed and the documents will be validated from 2026-01-07.
 
Carregant...
Miniatura

Tipus de document

Treball de fi de màster

Data de publicació

Llicència de publicació

cc by-nc-nd (c) Rahaman Alhassan, 2024
Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/215532

The fate of presentism in modern physics: A matter of perspectives and contingencies

Títol de la revista

ISSN de la revista

Títol del volum

Recurs relacionat

Resum

Within the philosophy of time, there is an ancient debate between eternalists who defend the unreality of time and presentists who want to reify the time of our experience. Contemporary debate has clarified and crystallised the strongest arguments for these two disparate ontologies of time, drawing from modern physics in the case of eternalism and from common-sense intuitions relating directly to our experience of time in the case of presentism. Recent attempts at resolving this ontological dispute purport to be able to reconstruct the time of our experience from our physical conception of time as a perspectival phenomenon, thus integrating both approaches to ontology. This paper argues that a principled investigation of mental representations of time will serve to further motivate such a reconciliatory project but also does important explanatory work alongside the considerations from physics seen in existing accounts such as Jenann Ismael’s. Specifically, an analysis of mental representations of time through the teleosemantic framework reveals our sense of time as domain specific and rhythmic, undermining presentists’ justificatory basis for drawing inferences regarding absolute simultaneity from our perception of simultaneity as well as exposing our perception of temporal flow as an artifice of cognitive processing. Similarly, considerations from teleosemantic theory regarding the faithfulness of our mental representations seem to refute eternalists’ justification for discarding our experience of time as illusory. Finally, I briefly suggest an avenue for further investigation into understanding the emergence of the various properties of subjective time from physical time through the observation that we are not simply subjects in time, but, in some sense, embedded and embodied participants in time.

Descripció

Màster en Filosofia Analítica (APhil), Facultat Filosofía, Universitat de Barcelona, Curs: 2023-2024, Director/Tutor: Manuel Jesús Martínez

Matèries (anglès)

Citació

Citació

RAHAMAN ALHASSAN, Aslak. The fate of presentism in modern physics: A matter of perspectives and contingencies. [consulta: 4 de gener de 2026]. [Disponible a: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/215532]

Exportar metadades

JSON - METS

Compartir registre