Document type

Working paper

Publication date

Publication license

cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Frutos Cachorro et al., 2018
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/125421

Strategic investment decisions under the nuclear power debate in Belgium [WP]

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Additional contribution

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

In view of the current nuclear power debate in Belgium, we analyze how uncertainty about a nuclear phase-out, coupled with the implementation of renewable energy subsidies and nuclear taxes, affects investment capacity and productivity decisions by Belgian electricity suppliers. To achieve this goal, considering the key characteristics of the Belgian market, we build a Stackelberg closed-loop (two-stage) equilibrium model in which investment decisions are made in a first stage under uncertainty regarding a nuclear phase-out, and productivity decisions are subsequently made in a second stage in a c ertainty environment. Our analysis indicates that, regardless of subsidies, an increase in the probability of nuclear license extension results in lower levels of investment - primarily in renewable energy -, lower total production and a higher electricity price. We also show that the implementation of renewable energy subsidies reduces the effect of an increase in probability of nuclear license extension on producer’s decisions regarding expanded capacity and on total profits in the market.

Related resource

Citation

Citation

FRUTOS CACHORRO, Julia de, WILLEGHEMS, Gwen and BUYSSE, Jeroen. Strategic investment decisions under the nuclear power debate in Belgium [WP]. UB Economics – Working Papers. 2018. Vol.  E18/383. [consulted: 15 of October of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/125421

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record