Tracing the evolution of the brightest galaxies and diffuse light in galaxy groups

dc.contributor.authorBilata-Woldeyes, Betelehem
dc.contributor.authorPerea Duarte, Jaime D.
dc.contributor.authorSolanes, José M. (José María)
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-19T18:59:54Z
dc.date.available2026-01-19T18:59:54Z
dc.date.issued2025-12
dc.date.updated2026-01-19T18:59:54Z
dc.description.abstractWe present the second study based on a suite of 100 cosmologically motivated, controlled N-body simulations designed to advance our understanding of the role of purely gravitational dynamics in the early formation of low-mass galaxy groups (∼1–5 × 1013 M⊙). In this work, we investigate the temporal evolution of key indicators of dynamical relaxation, with a particular emphasis on the secular growth of the diffuse intragroup light (IGL), the four major group galaxies, and the mass distributions of their progenitors. We also assess the diagnostic power of several magnitude gaps between top-ranked galaxies as proxies for dynamical age. As in our previous study, we compare the outcomes from three group classes defined by the number of the brightest group galaxies (BGGs) present at the end of the simulations: single-, double-, and non-BGG systems. We find that the early assembly of galaxy groups is consistent with a stochastic Poisson process at an approximately constant merger rate. Various dynamical diagnostics, including galaxy pairwise separations, velocity dispersions, and the offset of the first-ranked galaxy from the group barycentre, indicate that single-BGG groups evolve more rapidly towards virialisation than double- and (especially) non-BGG systems. We further find that first-ranked group members and the IGL, despite their intertwined origins, follow distinct growth histories, with the IGL assembled from a more numerous and systematically lower mass population than the central object. This distinction is particularly pronounced in non-BGG systems, where about one-third of the IGL originates from small galaxies, each contributing less than 5% to this component. Among the tested magnitude gaps, the difference between the first- and fourth-ranked galaxies, Δℳ4−1, is proven to be a more robust indicator of dynamical age for low-mass groups than the conventional Δℳ2−1 gap. The Δℳ5−1 and Δℳ6−1 gaps also perform well and might be preferable in certain contexts.
dc.format.extent16 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec763978
dc.identifier.issn0004-6361
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/225762
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEDP Sciences
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556694
dc.relation.ispartofAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2025, vol. 704, p. 1-16
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556694
dc.rights(c) The European Southern Observatory (ESO), 2025
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.classificationEvolució de les galàxies
dc.subject.classificationAstrofísica
dc.subject.classificationGalàxies actives
dc.subject.otherGalaxies evolution
dc.subject.otherAstrophysics
dc.subject.otherActive galaxies
dc.titleTracing the evolution of the brightest galaxies and diffuse light in galaxy groups
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
911973.pdf
Mida:
5.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format