Document type
ArticleVersion
Published versionPublication date
All rights reserved
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/131486
Prediction and explanation in the multiverse
Journal Title
Director/Tutor
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Related resource
Abstract
Probabilities in the multiverse can be calculated by assuming that we are typical representatives in a given reference class. But is this class well defined? What should be included in the ensemble in which we are supposed to be typical? There is a widespread belief that this question is inherently vague, and that there are various possible choices for the types of reference objects which should be counted in. Here we argue that the "ideal" reference class (for the purpose of making predictions) can be defined unambiguously in a rather precise way, as the set of all observers with identical information content. When the observers in a given class perform an experiment, the class branches into subclasses who learn different information from the outcome of that experiment. The probabilities for the different outcomes are defined as the relative numbers of observers in each subclass. For practical purposes, wider reference classes can be used, where we trace over all information which is uncorrelated to the outcome of the experiment, or whose correlation with it is beyond our current understanding. We argue that, once we have gathered all practically available evidence, the optimal strategy for making predictions is to consider ourselves typical in any reference class we belong to, unless we have evidence to the contrary. In the latter case, the class must be correspondingly narrowed.
Subject
Subject (English)
Citation
Citation
GARRIGA TORRES, Jaume and VILENKIN, A. (Alexander). Prediction and explanation in the multiverse. Physical Review D. 2008. Vol. 77, num. 4, pags. 043526. ISSN 1550-7998. [consulted: 19 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/131486