Recommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted gynaecological surgery: consensus from the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS)

dc.contributor.authorRusch, Peter
dc.contributor.authorInd, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorKimmig, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorMaggion, Angelo
dc.contributor.authorPonce i Sebastià, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorZanagnolo, Vanna
dc.contributor.authorCoronado Martín, Pluvio Jesús
dc.contributor.authorVerguts, Jasper
dc.contributor.authorLambaudie, Eric
dc.contributor.authorFalconer, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Justin W.
dc.contributor.authorVerheljen, Rene H.M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-10T11:51:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-10T11:51:13Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01
dc.date.updated2020-06-10T11:51:13Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) aims at developing a European consensus on core components of a curriculum for training and assessment in robot assisted gynaecological surgery. Methods: a Delphi process was initiated among a panel of 12 experts in robot assisted surgery invited through the SERGS. An online questionnaire survey was based on a literature search for standards in education in gynaecological robot assisted surgery. The survey was performed in three consecutive rounds to reach optimal consensus. The results of this survey were discussed by the panel and led to consensus recommendations on 39 issues, adhering to general principles of medical education. Results: on review there appeared to be no accredited training programs in Europe, and few in the USA. Recommendations for requirements of training centres, educational tools and assessment of proficiency varied widely. Stepwise and structured training together with validated assessment based on competencies rather than on volume emerged as prerequisites for adequate and safe learning. An appropriate educational environment and tools for training were defined. Although certification should be competence based, the panel recommended additional volume based criteria for both accreditation of training centres and certification of individual surgeons. Conclusions: consensus was reached on minimum criteria for training in robot assisted gynaecological surgery. To transfer results into clinical practice, experts recommended a curriculum and guidelines that have now been endorsed by SERGS to be used to establish training programmes for robot assisted surgery.
dc.format.extent13 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec695273
dc.identifier.issn2032-0418
dc.identifier.pmid31695855
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/165040
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversa Press
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://www.fvvo.be/archive/volume-11/number-1/
dc.relation.ispartofFacts, Views and Vision in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2019, vol. 11, num. 1, p. 29-41
dc.rights(c) Rusch, Peter et al., 2019
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationFormació
dc.subject.classificationRobots
dc.subject.classificationCirurgia ginecològica
dc.subject.otherTraining
dc.subject.otherRobots
dc.subject.otherGynecologic surgery
dc.titleRecommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted gynaecological surgery: consensus from the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS)
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
695273.pdf
Mida:
582.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format