Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Interpreting the CMB aberration and Doppler measurements: boost or intrinsic dipole?

dc.contributor.authorRoldan, Omar
dc.contributor.authorNotari, Alessio
dc.contributor.authorQuartin, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-14T11:19:40Z
dc.date.available2019-02-14T11:19:40Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-10
dc.date.updated2019-02-14T11:19:40Z
dc.description.abstractThe aberration and Doppler coupling effects of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) were recently measured by the Planck satellite. The most straightforward interpretation leads to a direct detection of our peculiar velocity β, consistent with the measurement of the well-known dipole. In this paper we discuss the assumptions behind such interpretation. We show that Doppler-like couplings appear from two effects: our peculiar velocity and a second order large-scale effect due to the dipolar part of the gravitational potential. We find that the two effects are exactly degenerate but only if we assume second-order initial conditions from single-field Inflation. Thus, detecting a discrepancy in the value of β from the dipole and the Doppler couplings implies the presence of a primordial non-Gaussianity. We also show that aberration-like signals likewise arise from two independent effects: our peculiar velocity and lensing due to a first order large-scale dipolar gravitational potential, independently on Gaussianity of the initial conditions. In general such effects are not degenerate and so a discrepancy between the measured β from the dipole and aberration could be accounted for by a dipolar gravitational potential. Only through a fine-tuning of the radial profile of the potential it is possible to have a complete degeneracy with a boost effect. Finally we discuss that we also expect other signatures due to integrated second order terms, which may be further used to disentangle this scenario from a simple boost.
dc.format.extent31 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec669247
dc.identifier.issn1475-7516
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/128239
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics (IOP)
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/026
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2016, vol. 2016
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/026
dc.rightscc-by (c) Roldan, Omar et al., 2016
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Física Quàntica i Astrofísica)
dc.subject.classificationCosmologia
dc.subject.classificationAberració (Astronomia)
dc.subject.otherCosmology
dc.subject.otherAberration
dc.titleInterpreting the CMB aberration and Doppler measurements: boost or intrinsic dipole?
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
669247.pdf
Mida:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format