How many came home? Evaluating ex‐situ conservation of green turtles in the Cayman Islands

dc.contributor.authorBarbanti, Anna
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Clara
dc.contributor.authorBlumenthal, Janice M.
dc.contributor.authorBoyle, Jack
dc.contributor.authorBroderick, Annette C.
dc.contributor.authorCollyer, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorEbanks-Petrie, Gina
dc.contributor.authorGodley, Brendan J.
dc.contributor.authorMustin, Walter
dc.contributor.authorOrdóñez Sánchez, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorPascual Berniola, Marta
dc.contributor.authorCarreras Huergo, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-22T13:38:16Z
dc.date.available2024-03-22T13:38:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-13
dc.date.updated2024-03-22T13:38:21Z
dc.description.abstractEx-situ management is an important conservation tool that allows the preservation of biological diversity outside natural habitats while supporting survival in the wild. Captive breeding followed by reintroduction is a possible approach for endangered species conservation and preservation of genetic variability. The Cayman Turtle Centre Ltd was established in 1968 to market green turtle (Chelonia mydas) meat and other products and replenish wild populations, thought to be locally extirpated, through captive breeding. We evaluated the effects of this reintroduction program using molecular markers (13 microsatellites, 800bp D-loop and STR mtDNA sequences) from captive breeders (N=257) and wild nesting females (N=57) (sampling period: 2013-2015). We divided the captive breeders into three groups: founders (from the original stock), and then two subdivisions of F1 individuals corresponding to two different management strategies, cohort 1995 ("C1995)" and multicohort F1 ("MCF1"). Loss of genetic variability and increased relatedness was observed in the captive stock over time. We found no significant differences in diversity among captive and wild groups, and similar or higher levels of haplotype variability when compared to other natural populations. Using parentage and sibship assignment, we determined that 90% of the wild individuals were related to the captive stock. Our results suggest a strong impact of the reintroduction program on the present recovery of the wild green turtle population nesting in the Cayman Islands. Moreover, genetic relatedness analyses of captive populations are necessary to improve future management actions to maintain genetic diversity in the long term and avoid inbreeding depression.
dc.format.extent15 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec689570
dc.identifier.issn0962-1083
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/209019
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15017
dc.relation.ispartofMolecular Ecology, 2019, vol. 28, num.7, p. 1637-1651
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15017
dc.rights(c) John Wiley & Sons, 2019
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)
dc.subject.classificationTortugues marines
dc.subject.classificationCaiman (Illes)
dc.subject.classificationProtecció de la fauna
dc.subject.otherSea turtles
dc.subject.otherCayman Islands
dc.subject.otherWildlife conservation
dc.titleHow many came home? Evaluating ex‐situ conservation of green turtles in the Cayman Islands
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
217806.pdf
Mida:
1.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format