Document type

Working paper

Publication date

Publication license

cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Duch et al. 2007
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/11956

Evaluating the impact of public subsidies on a firm's performance: a quasi-experimental approach [WP-ERE]

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Related resource

Abstract

Many regional governments in developed countries design programs to improve the competitiveness of local firms. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of public programs whose aim is to enhance the performance of firms located in Catalonia (Spain). We compare the performance of publicly subsidised companies (treated) with that of similar, but unsubsidised companies (non-treated). We use the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) methodology to construct a control group which, with respect to its observable characteristics, is as similar as possible to the treated group, and that allows us to identify firms which retain the same propensity to receive public subsidies. Once a valid comparison group has been established, we compare the respective performance of each firm. As a result, we find that recipient firms, on average, change their business practices, improve their performance, and increase their value added as a direct result of public subsidy programs.
- Muchos gobiernos regionales en los países desarrollados diseñan programas para mejorar la competitividad de las empresas locales. En este papel, evaluamos la efectividad de programas públicos cuyo objetivo es reforzar la actuación de las empresas localizada en Cataluña (España). Se compara la actuación de empresas subvencionadas (tratadas) con empresas similares, pero no subvencionadas (no tratadas). Se utiliza el Propensity Score Matching (PSM) para construir un grupo de control que, con respecto a las principales características, es muy similar al grupo tratado, lo que permite identificar empresas que presentan la misma propensión a recibir subvenciones. Una vez se ha establecido un grupo de comparación válido, se comparan los resultados de cada empresa. Como resultado se encuentra que, en promedio, las empresas tratadas cambian sus prácticas comerciales, mejoran su actuación, y aumentan su valor añadido como resultado directo de los programas públicos.

Citation

Citation

DUCH BROWN, Néstor, MONTOLIO, Daniel and MEDIAVILLA, Mauro. Evaluating the impact of public subsidies on a firm's performance: a quasi-experimental approach  [WP-ERE]. Documents de treball (Facultat d'Economia i Empresa. Espai de Recerca en Economia). 2007. Vol.  E07/181. [consulted: 6 of June of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/11956

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record